Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik
Vol. 6, No. 1, January 2024
THE INFLUENCE OF THE QUALITY OF BRAND IMAGE AND GREEN MARKETING
SERVICES ON THE BODY SHOP CONSUMERS' PURCHASING DECISIONS AT MALLS IN SOUTH
JAKARTA
Amanda Rachmawati Rasyid1, Resti Hardini2, Kumba
Digdowiseiso3*
Faculty
of Economics, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia1,2,3
Email:
amandarasyid@gmail.com1, resti.hardini@civitas.unas.ac.id2,
kumba.digdo@civitas.unas.ac.id3*
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the effect of service quality,
brand image, and green marketing on consumer purchasing decision of The Body
Shop at mall in South Jakarta. The result of this research is using primary
data in the form of questionnaires to 100 respondents of The Body Shop
consumers in mall in South Jakarta using Statistical Product and Service
Solutions (SPSS) method. Data collection techniques in this study by
observation and survey, unstructured interviews, and using questionnaires. The
result of the research using F test and t test indicate that there is influence
of service quality, brand image and green marketing towards purchasing decision
of The Body Shop at mall in South Jakarta.
Keywords: Service
Quality, Brand Image, Green Marketing, Purchase Decision
INTRODUCTION
The
increasingly rapid development of the business world today causesCompanies have to face tough
competition. In this era of increasingly rapid development, especially in terms
of fulfilling consumer needs and desires. Consumers today tend to be more
individualistic and demand things that are more personal or personalized. To
meet these needs, companies are required to be able to understand consumers'
desires and needs in order to survive. Whether the product being sold is
accepted or not really depends on the consumer's perception of the product. If
consumers feel that the product meets their needs and desires, consumers will
definitely buy the product. So companies are required to always meet consumer
needs and desires. Besides that, providing something different (different) as a
strategy to meet competition should also be done by companies. The number of
brands circulating in Indonesia is very large, meaning consumers are faced with
many choices and it makes it difficult for them to choose. The Body Shop is a
company that operates in the beauty business in the form of cosmetic or make-up
products. The Body Shop was born with the idea of reusing, refilling and
recycling what they could reuse. The advantage of The Body Shop is the use of
natural ingredients in its products. The Body Shop is a cosmetics company that
carries an environmentally friendly concept in its marketing strategy. There
are three supporting pillars whose principles are Profit, People and Planet.
The Body Shop is available throughout Indonesia,
The Body Shop in Jakarta can be found in 5 areas, namely Central Jakarta, East
Jakarta, West Jakarta, North Jakarta and South Jakarta. Based on information
obtained, compared to other areas of DKI Jakarta, malls in South Jakarta have
more visitors on average, namely almost 100 thousand visitors per day. (http://www.cyapila.com/2014/09/12/jakarta-kota-mal//,
2014). This research took the location of The Body Shop outlets in malls in
South Jakarta, including: MallGandaria City, Kemang Village Mall,
Pejaten Village Mall, Pondok Indah Mall, Kota Kasablanca Mall.
Based on the background, the author is
interested in conducting research with the title "The Influence of Service
Quality, Brand Image, and Green Marketing on Consumer Purchasing Decisions of
The Body Shop at Malls in South Jakarta"
Based
on the background of the problem above, research questions can be formulated as
follows:
1) Is
there a positive and significant influence of service quality on consumer
purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?
2) Is
there a positive and significant influence of brand image on consumer
purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?
3) Is
there a positive and significant influence of green marketing on consumer
purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?
RESEARCH METHODS
In this research, the
object of research is consumer purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls
in South Jakarta. Purchasing decisions are influenced by service quality, brand
image, and green marketing. The data source used in this
research is primary data, namely data obtained directly from original sources
(without intermediaries) providing questions by distributing questionnaires to
respondents where the author makes written questions related to the research,
with the requirement that consumers use cosmetic products. The Body Shop at a
mall in South Jakarta. By adding data in the form of literature, documents and
other information to strengthen the primary data.
The type of data used in this
research is descriptive qualitative data, which was obtained directly from the
research object through distributing questionnaires. According to Sugiyono
(2013:23) Population is a generalized area consisting of objects/subjects that
have certain qualities and characteristics which are applied by researchers to
study and then draw conclusions. According to Sugiyono (2010, 118) what is
meant by sample is part of the number and characteristics possessed by the
population. The sampling technique used by the author is non-probability
sampling. According to Sugiyono (2010: 120), non-probability sampling is:
"A sampling technique that provides equal opportunities for each element
or member of the population to be selected as a sample.
The
non-probability sampling technique used in sampling in this research is
purposive sampling and quota sampling techniques. The definition of purposive
sampling according to Sugiyono (2010: 122) is "a technique for determining
samples with certain considerations."
Understanding
quota sampling According to Sugiyono (2013: 60) states that quota sampling is a
technique for determining samples from a population that has certain
characteristics up to the desired number (quota). In this study, the following
criteria were used:
1)
The Body Shop customers who have previously purchased The Body Shop at that
outlet.
2)
They decide to buy The Body Shop products based on their own decisions
The population in this study is
large and the number is unlimited, in this study the population cannot be
known, so the number of samples in this study is calculated using the Wiliam
formula (2011:34), as follows:
(Zα
/ P* (1-P*)![]()
n =
Information :
P* =
Population proportion
E = Error tolerance limit 10%= 0.10
α
= 0.05
(Zα/
=Normal
distribution score with a significance level of 5% = 1.96
0.5 (1-0.5)
n=
0.10²
=
96.04 rounded to 100
From
the results of these calculations, this research took a sample of 100
respondents. The Body Shop outlets are found throughout Indonesia, especially
in Jakarta. Judging from the number of visitors to The Body Shop customers at
malls in South Jakarta, it is higher than at malls in Central Jakarta, East
Jakarta, West Jakarta and North Jakarta. There are 13 The Body Shop outlets in
malls in South Jakarta, but due to several limitations including limited time
and energy, the researchers conducted this research at 5 The Body Shop outlets
in malls in South Jakarta.
The
malls are as follows:
1)
Gandaria City Mall
2) Kemang
Village Mall
3) Pejaten
Village Mall
4) Pondok
Indah Mall
5)
Kasalanca City Mall
Data Collection Techniques and Tools
Data collection techniques in this research were carried out using 3 methods, namely:
1) Observation
and survey
2) Unstructured
interviews (unstructured interviews
3) The
data collection method that will be used in this research is using personal
questionnaires (Personally Administered Questionnaires).
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
Inferential
Analysis
According to Sugiyono (2012:207)
inferential statistics is a statistical technique used to analyze sample data
and the results are applied to the population. This statistic is suitable for
use if the sample is taken from a clear population, and the sampling technique
from that population is carried out randomly.
Table 1. Multiple Regression Test
Results
|
Coefficientsa |
|||||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
Collinearity Statistics |
|
|||
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
Tolerance |
VIF |
|
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1,472 |
1,939 |
|
,759 |
,450 |
|
|
|
|
Service Quality |
,193 |
,095 |
,171 |
2,031 |
,045 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
|
Brand Image |
,368 |
,085 |
,365 |
4,352 |
,000 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
|
Green Marketing |
,334 |
,082 |
,347 |
4,066 |
,000 |
,701 |
1,427 |
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision |
|||||||||
Source:
Process data with SPSS 24.0
Based on the results of the
analysis, it can be seen that the multiple regression equation can be
formulated as follows:
Y= 1.472 +
0.193 + 0.368 + 0.334![]()
Instrument
Test
Validity Test Results
The
validity test is used to test the extent to which the accuracy of the measuring
instrument can reveal the concept of the symptom/event being measured. The R
table used in this research is 0.197 (100 respondents with a significance level
of 5%). The results of the validity test can be seen in Table 2 as follows:
Table 2. Validity Test Results
|
Variable |
R Count |
R Table |
Sig |
Results |
|
Service Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
X1_1 |
0.586 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X1_2 |
0.681 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X1_3 |
0.762 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X1_4 |
0.682 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X1_5 |
0.669 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Brand Image |
|
|
|
|
|
X2_1 |
0.648 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X2_2 |
0.663 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X2_3 |
0.806 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X2_4 |
0.695 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X2_5 |
0.773 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Green Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
X3_1 |
0.744 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X3_2 |
0.758 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X3_3 |
0.711 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X3_4 |
0.650 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
X3_5 |
0.567 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Buying decision |
|
|
|
|
|
Y_1 |
0.593 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Y_2 |
0.661 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Y_3 |
0.719 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Y_4 |
0.642 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
|
Y_5 |
0.785 |
0.197 |
0,000 |
Valid |
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
ResultsReliability
Test
Table 3. Reliability Test Results
|
Variable |
Cronbach's Alpha |
Results |
|
Purchasing Quality (Y) |
0.770 |
Reliable |
|
Service Quality (X1) |
0.769 |
Reliable |
|
Brand Image (X2) |
0.786 |
Reliable |
|
Green Marketing (X3) |
0.772 |
Reliable |
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
Based on Table3 above, shows that
each item from each dependent variable, namely purchasing decisions, and the
independent variables, namely service quality, brand image, and green
marketing, have a Cronbach alpha's value greater than 0.60. So it can be
concluded that the variable indicators of purchasing decisions (Y), service
quality (X1), brand image (X2), and green marketing (X3), are all declared
reliable or trustworthy as variable measuring instruments.
Classic assumption test
ResultsNormality
test
The
normality test is one of the requirements before carrying out regression
testing. This test was carried out using the Kolmogorov – Smirnov test. The
normality test results can be seen in Table 4 as follows:
Table
4. Normality Test Results
|
One-Sample
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test |
||
|
|
Unstandardized Residuals |
|
|
N |
100 |
|
|
Normal Parameters, b |
Mean |
,0000000 |
|
Std. Deviation |
1.58998609 |
|
|
Most Extreme Differences |
Absolute |
,080 |
|
Positive |
,062 |
|
|
Negative |
-,080 |
|
|
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z |
,804 |
|
|
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) |
,538 |
|
|
a. Test distribution is Normal. |
||
|
b. Calculated from data. |
||
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
The normality test results in Table
4 using the One-Sample Kolomogorov-Smirnov Test obtained a significance value
or Asymp Sig. (2-tailed) is 0.538 which is above 0.05 so it can be concluded
that the data is normally distributed and suitable for use in the regression
model.
Autocorrelation
Test Results
The
autocorrelation test is used to determine whether or not there are deviations
from the classic assumption of autocorrelation, namely the correlation that
occurs between the residuals in one observation and other observations in the
regression model. The results of the autocorrelation test can be seen in Table
5 as follows:
Table
5. Autocorrelation Test Results
Model
Summaryb
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
|
|
1 |
.714a |
,509 |
,494 |
1.61464 |
2,095 |
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
Table 5
shows that the value of Durbin-Watson (d) in this study is 2.095. This study
used a sample size of 100 (n=100) with du (inner limit) = 1.758 and dl (outer
limit) = 1.592. The upper limit of the du value for this study is 1.758 so 4-du
is 2.242. Thus, it can be concluded that the d value of 2.095 is located
between du and 4-du (1.758 < 2.095 < 2.242) so it can be concluded that
there is no autocorrelation in the regression model used in this research.
Multicollinearity Test Results
Table 6. Multicollinearity Test
Results
|
Coefficientsa |
||||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
Q |
Sig. |
Collinearity Statistics |
|||
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
Tolerance |
VIF |
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1,472 |
1,939 |
|
,759 |
,450 |
|
|
|
Service Quality |
,193 |
,095 |
,171 |
2,031 |
,045 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
Brand Image |
,368 |
,085 |
,365 |
4,352 |
,000 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
Green Marketing |
,334 |
,082 |
,347 |
4,066 |
,000 |
,701 |
1,427 |
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision |
||||||||
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
The results of the
multicollinearity test in Table 4.34 above show that all independent variables,
namely suit quality, brand image and green marketing, have a tolerance value
greater than 0.1 and the variance inflation factor (VIF) value is below 10,
which means there are no symptoms. multicollinearity in this regression model.
The service quality variable has a tolerance value of 0.725 and a VIF value of
1.379. For the brand image variable, it has a tolerance value of 0.725 and a
VIF value of 1.379. Meanwhile, the green marketing variable has a tolerance
value of 0.701 and a VIF value of 1.427.
Heteroscedasticity Test Results
Heteroscedasticity testing aims to
test whether the regression model has unequal variance from the residuals of
one observation to another. A good regression model isnot occurheteroscedasticity
and to determine the presence of heteroscedasticity using the Glejser test. If
the three independent variables are statistically significant and do not
influence the dependent variable, then there is an indication that
heteroscedasticity does not occur. The following are the results of the
heteroscedasticity test on the regression model in this study:
Table 7. Heteroscedasticity Test
Results
Corellations
|
Variable |
Sig |
Results |
|
Service Quality |
0.932 |
Not occurheteroscedasticity |
|
Brand Image |
0.946 |
Not occurheteroscedasticity |
|
Green Marketing |
0.910 |
Not occurheteroscedasticity |
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
Table
7 shows that all variables have a significant value greater than 0.05, so it
can be concluded that the regression model in this study does not have
heteroscedasticity.
Model
Feasibility Test
Simultaneous Test Results (F test)
This technique is used to determine
the influence of independent variables together on the dependent variable. To
find out whether simultaneously, the regression coefficient of the independent
variable has a real influence on the dependent variable or not.
Table 8. Simultaneous F Test
Results
|
ANOVAa |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
Df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
259,722 |
3 |
86,574 |
33,208 |
,000b |
|
Residual |
250,278 |
96 |
2,607 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
510,000 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable:
Purchase Decision |
||||||
|
b. Predictors:
(Constant), Green Marketing, Brand Image, Service Quality |
||||||
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
Table 8 shows the results of the simultaneous
test or F test where the calculated F value was obtained at 33,208 with a
significance level of .000. Because the significance level of the sig value is
<0.05, this means that service quality, brand image and green marketing
together influence purchasing decisions.
Coefficient of Determination (R2)
The
purpose of this test is to find out how much the combination of independent
variables is able to explain variations in the dependent variable. The results
of the coefficient of determination test appear in Table 9.
Table 9. Coefficient of
Determination Test Results
Model Summary b
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
|
|
1 |
,714a |
,509 |
,494 |
1.61464 |
|
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Green Marketing, Brand Image, Service
Quality |
|||||
|
b. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision |
|||||
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
Based on Table 9, the Adjusted R
Square is 0.494, this means that the dependent variable, namely purchasing
decisions, can be explained by independent variables which include service
quality, brand image and green marketing at 49.4 percent, while the remaining
50.6 percent is explained by factors. other than the independent variables used
in this research.
Partial
Hypothesis Test Results (t test)
The partial t test is used to determine the
effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. The partial t
test is said to be significant if the sig value. each variable is no more than
alpha (Sig. < 0.05). The results of the partial t test can be seen in Table
10 below:
Table
10. Partial t Test Results
|
Coefficientsa |
|||||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized
Coefficients |
Standardized
Coefficients |
Q |
Sig. |
Collinearity
Statistics |
|
|||
|
B |
Std.
Error |
Beta |
Tolerance |
VIF |
|
||||
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1,472 |
1,939 |
|
,759 |
,450 |
|
|
|
|
Service
Quality |
,193 |
,095 |
,171 |
2,031 |
,045 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
|
Brand
Image |
,368 |
,085 |
,365 |
4,352 |
,000 |
,725 |
1,379 |
|
|
|
Green
Marketing |
,334 |
,082 |
,347 |
4,066 |
,000 |
,701 |
1,427 |
|
|
|
a.
Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision |
|||||||||
Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0
The influence of each variable of service quality,
brand image and green marketing on purchasing decisions can be seen from the
direction and level of significance (probability).
Based on the calculation results in
table 4.39, it is explained as follows:
1) Testing the Service Quality
Hypothesis (X1) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)
Based on the test results in table 4.39
above, it shows that the tcount value for the Service Quality variable (X1) is
2.031 with a significant value of 0.045, so the ttable value (α = 0.05) must be
looked for which is 1.984, because the tcount value (2.031 > 1.984) with the
level significant (0.045 < 0.05), then Ho is rejected, which means there is
a positive and significant influence betweenService Quality (X1) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)
2) Testing the Brand Image Hypothesis
(X2) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)
Based on the test results in table 4.39
above, it shows that the tcount value for the Brand Image variable (X2) is
4.352 with a significant value of 0.000, so the ttable value (α = 0.05) must be
looked for which is 1.984, because the tcount value (4.352 > 1.984) with the
level significant (0.000 < 0.05), then Ho is rejected, which means there is
a positive and significant influence betweenBrand Image (X2) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)
3) Testing the Green Marketing
Hypothesis (X3) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)
Based on the test results in table 4.39 above, it shows that the
tcount value for the variableGreen Marketing(X3) is 4.066 with a significant value of 0.000, so you have to
look for the ttable value (α = 0.05) which is 1.984, because the tcount value
(4.066 > 1.984) has a significant level of (0.045 < 0.05), then Ho is
rejected, which means there is a positive and significant influence betweenGreen
Marketing(X3) on Purchase Decisions (Y).
CONCLUSION
Based on
the results of the research and discussion, the following conclusions can be
drawn; (1) service quality has a positive and significant effect on consumer
purchasing decisions, which means that if service quality is improved,
purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta will increase,
(2) brand image has a positive and significant effect on consumer purchasing
decisions, which meaning that if a good company image is maintained, then
purchasing decisions towards The Body Shop at the mall in South Jakarta will
increase, and (3) green marketing has a positive and significant effect on
consumer purchasing decisions, which means that if the company maintains and
develops green marketing, then decisions purchases of The Body Shop at malls in
South Jakarta will increase.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ferrinadewi. (2008).
Merek dan Psikologi Konsmen: Implikasi
Pada StrategiPemasaran. Edisi 1. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.
Kotler, P. (2007). Marketing Manajemen. 12thed. Pearson
Education. New Jersey. Terjemahan B. Sabran. 2010. Manajemen Pemasaran.
Edisi 12. PT.Indeks.Jakarta.
_______________.
(2012). Marketing Management. 12th ed. Global Edition Pearson PrenticeHall. Terjemahan Teguh, H.,
R.A. Rusli dan B. Molan. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi 12 . PT. Indeks.
Jakarta.
Kusumawati,
E. (2020). Commitment to the Teacher’s Loyalty as a Customer. In 3rd
International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and
Management (ICREAM 2019) (pp. 48-51). Atlantis Press.
Kusumawati, E. (2020). Leadership in Total Quality
Management for Service Quality.
Peter & Olson . (2010). Consumer
Behavior and Marketing Strategy 9thed New York. Mc Graw Hill. USA. Terjemahan Lina Salim. 2012. Perilaku Konsumen dan Strategi Pemasaran.
Edisi 5. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Paysal, S. (2016). Pengaruh
Green Marketing Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian
Pada Produk Nike di Bandung. Journal e-Proceeding of Science. 2(3) : 2442-5826.
Sangadji & Sopiah. (2013).
Perilaku Konsumen : Pendekatan Praktis
Disertai Himpunan Jurnal Penelitian.
Edisi pertama. Andi. Yogyakarta.
Schiffman & Kanuk. (2007). Consumer Behavior. 15thed. Prentice-Hall
Inc. New Jersey. Terjemahan. Zulkifli Kasip. 2008. Prilaku Konsumen. Edisi 7. PT Indexs.
Jakarta.
Singh. Green Marketing: Opportunityfor
Innovation and Sustainable Development. Available at SSRN. :http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636622 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636622.
15 september 2017 (15.20).
Sugiyono. (2010).
Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Edisi
Revisi. Alfabeta. Bandung.
________. (2012).
Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Edisi
20. Alfabeta. Bandung.
________.(2013).
Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Edisi 1. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Sutisna. (2001).
Perilaku Konsumen Dan Komunikasi Pemasaran. Edisi 1. Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bandung.
Tjiptono. F. (2012).
Pemasaran Strategik. Edisi 2. Andi.
Yogyakarta.
Weenas, J.
R. S. (2013).
Kualitas Produk, Harga, Promosi dan Kualitas Pelayanan, Pengaruh Terhadap
Keputusan Pembelian Spring Bed Comforta. Jurnal
EMBA. 1(4): 607 618
William. (2011). Using Information Technology A Practical Introduction to Computers & Communications. 9thed. McGraw-Hill. New York. Terjemahan Iwan Sofana. 2012. Menggunakan Teknologi Informasi Pengantar Praktis untuk Komputer 7 Komunikasi. Edisi 9. Informatika. Jakarta.
Yanti, M. O. Z. & Sukotjo, H. (2016). Pengaruh Kesadaran
Merek, Asosiasi Merek, Dan Brand
Image Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Aqua. Jurnal
ilmu dan riset manajemen. 5(5) : 2461-0593.
Yazdanifard. (2011). The impact of Green Marketing on Customer satisfaction and Envi
ronmental safety. 5thed. IACSIT Press. Singapore. Terjemahan B. Sabran. 2013. Dampak Green Marketing terhadap kepuasan pelanggan dan keamanan lingkungan. Edisi 5. Erlangga. Jakarta.
|
Amanda Rachmawati
Rasyid, Resti Hardini,
Kumba Digdowiseiso (2024) |
|
First publication rights: Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah
Sosial Teknik |
|
This article is licensed under the following: |