Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik

Vol. 6, No. 1, January 2024

 

 

THE INFLUENCE OF THE QUALITY OF BRAND IMAGE AND GREEN MARKETING SERVICES ON THE BODY SHOP CONSUMERS' PURCHASING DECISIONS AT MALLS IN SOUTH JAKARTA

 

Amanda Rachmawati Rasyid1, Resti Hardini2, Kumba Digdowiseiso3*

Faculty of Economics, Universitas Nasional, Indonesia1,2,3

Email: amandarasyid@gmail.com1, resti.hardini@civitas.unas.ac.id2, kumba.digdo@civitas.unas.ac.id3*

 

 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze the effect of service quality, brand image, and green marketing on consumer purchasing decision of The Body Shop at mall in South Jakarta. The result of this research is using primary data in the form of questionnaires to 100 respondents of The Body Shop consumers in mall in South Jakarta using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) method. Data collection techniques in this study by observation and survey, unstructured interviews, and using questionnaires. The result of the research using F test and t test indicate that there is influence of service quality, brand image and green marketing towards purchasing decision of The Body Shop at mall in South Jakarta.

Keywords: Service Quality, Brand Image, Green Marketing, Purchase Decision

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The increasingly rapid development of the business world today causesCompanies have to face tough competition. In this era of increasingly rapid development, especially in terms of fulfilling consumer needs and desires. Consumers today tend to be more individualistic and demand things that are more personal or personalized. To meet these needs, companies are required to be able to understand consumers' desires and needs in order to survive. Whether the product being sold is accepted or not really depends on the consumer's perception of the product. If consumers feel that the product meets their needs and desires, consumers will definitely buy the product. So companies are required to always meet consumer needs and desires. Besides that, providing something different (different) as a strategy to meet competition should also be done by companies. The number of brands circulating in Indonesia is very large, meaning consumers are faced with many choices and it makes it difficult for them to choose. The Body Shop is a company that operates in the beauty business in the form of cosmetic or make-up products. The Body Shop was born with the idea of ​​reusing, refilling and recycling what they could reuse. The advantage of The Body Shop is the use of natural ingredients in its products. The Body Shop is a cosmetics company that carries an environmentally friendly concept in its marketing strategy. There are three supporting pillars whose principles are Profit, People and Planet.

The Body Shop is available throughout Indonesia, The Body Shop in Jakarta can be found in 5 areas, namely Central Jakarta, East Jakarta, West Jakarta, North Jakarta and South Jakarta. Based on information obtained, compared to other areas of DKI Jakarta, malls in South Jakarta have more visitors on average, namely almost 100 thousand visitors per day. (http://www.cyapila.com/2014/09/12/jakarta-kota-mal//, 2014). This research took the location of The Body Shop outlets in malls in South Jakarta, including: MallGandaria City, Kemang Village Mall, Pejaten Village Mall, Pondok Indah Mall, Kota Kasablanca Mall.

Based on the background, the author is interested in conducting research with the title "The Influence of Service Quality, Brand Image, and Green Marketing on Consumer Purchasing Decisions of The Body Shop at Malls in South Jakarta"

Based on the background of the problem above, research questions can be formulated as follows:

1)  Is there a positive and significant influence of service quality on consumer purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?

2)  Is there a positive and significant influence of brand image on consumer purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?

3)  Is there a positive and significant influence of green marketing on consumer purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta?

 

RESEARCH METHODS

In this research, the object of research is consumer purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta. Purchasing decisions are influenced by service quality, brand image, and green marketing. The data source used in this research is primary data, namely data obtained directly from original sources (without intermediaries) providing questions by distributing questionnaires to respondents where the author makes written questions related to the research, with the requirement that consumers use cosmetic products. The Body Shop at a mall in South Jakarta. By adding data in the form of literature, documents and other information to strengthen the primary data.

The type of data used in this research is descriptive qualitative data, which was obtained directly from the research object through distributing questionnaires. According to Sugiyono (2013:23) Population is a generalized area consisting of objects/subjects that have certain qualities and characteristics which are applied by researchers to study and then draw conclusions. According to Sugiyono (2010, 118) what is meant by sample is part of the number and characteristics possessed by the population. The sampling technique used by the author is non-probability sampling. According to Sugiyono (2010: 120), non-probability sampling is: "A sampling technique that provides equal opportunities for each element or member of the population to be selected as a sample.

The non-probability sampling technique used in sampling in this research is purposive sampling and quota sampling techniques. The definition of purposive sampling according to Sugiyono (2010: 122) is "a technique for determining samples with certain considerations."

Understanding quota sampling According to Sugiyono (2013: 60) states that quota sampling is a technique for determining samples from a population that has certain characteristics up to the desired number (quota). In this study, the following criteria were used:

1) The Body Shop customers who have previously purchased The Body Shop at that outlet.

2) They decide to buy The Body Shop products based on their own decisions

The population in this study is large and the number is unlimited, in this study the population cannot be known, so the number of samples in this study is calculated using the Wiliam formula (2011:34), as follows:

             (Zα / P* (1-P*)

n =

                         

Information :

P*                    = Population proportion

E                     = Error tolerance limit 10%= 0.10

α                     = 0.05

(Zα/           =Normal distribution score with a significance level of 5% = 1.96

 

                                    0.5 (1-0.5)

n=

0.10²

                        = 96.04 rounded to 100

 

From the results of these calculations, this research took a sample of 100 respondents. The Body Shop outlets are found throughout Indonesia, especially in Jakarta. Judging from the number of visitors to The Body Shop customers at malls in South Jakarta, it is higher than at malls in Central Jakarta, East Jakarta, West Jakarta and North Jakarta. There are 13 The Body Shop outlets in malls in South Jakarta, but due to several limitations including limited time and energy, the researchers conducted this research at 5 The Body Shop outlets in malls in South Jakarta. The malls are as follows:

1) Gandaria City Mall

2) Kemang Village Mall

3) Pejaten Village Mall

4) Pondok Indah Mall

5) Kasalanca City Mall

 

Data Collection Techniques and Tools

Data collection techniques in this research were carried out using 3 methods, namely:

1)   Observation and survey

2)   Unstructured interviews (unstructured interviews

3)   The data collection method that will be used in this research is using personal questionnaires (Personally Administered Questionnaires).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Inferential Analysis

According to Sugiyono (2012:207) inferential statistics is a statistical technique used to analyze sample data and the results are applied to the population. This statistic is suitable for use if the sample is taken from a clear population, and the sampling technique from that population is carried out randomly.

Table 1. Multiple Regression Test Results

 

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

 

B

Std. Error

Beta

Tolerance

VIF

 

1

(Constant)

1,472

1,939

 

,759

,450

 

 

 

Service Quality

,193

,095

,171

2,031

,045

,725

1,379

 

Brand Image

,368

,085

,365

4,352

,000

,725

1,379

 

Green Marketing

,334

,082

,347

4,066

,000

,701

1,427

 

a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

Based on the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the multiple regression equation can be formulated as follows:

Y= 1.472 + 0.193 + 0.368 + 0.334

 

Instrument Test

Validity Test Results

The validity test is used to test the extent to which the accuracy of the measuring instrument can reveal the concept of the symptom/event being measured. The R table used in this research is 0.197 (100 respondents with a significance level of 5%). The results of the validity test can be seen in Table 2 as follows:

 

Table 2. Validity Test Results

Variable

R Count

R Table

Sig

Results

Service Quality

 

 

 

 

X1_1

0.586

0.197

0,000

Valid

X1_2

0.681

0.197

0,000

Valid

X1_3

0.762

0.197

0,000

Valid

X1_4

0.682

0.197

0,000

Valid

X1_5

0.669

0.197

0,000

Valid

Brand Image

 

 

 

 

X2_1

0.648

0.197

0,000

Valid

X2_2

0.663

0.197

0,000

Valid

X2_3

0.806

0.197

0,000

Valid

X2_4

0.695

0.197

0,000

Valid

X2_5

0.773

0.197

0,000

Valid

Green Marketing

 

 

 

 

X3_1

0.744

0.197

0,000

Valid

X3_2

0.758

0.197

0,000

Valid

X3_3

0.711

0.197

0,000

Valid

X3_4

0.650

0.197

0,000

Valid

X3_5

0.567

0.197

0,000

Valid

Buying decision

 

 

 

 

Y_1

0.593

0.197

0,000

Valid

Y_2

0.661

0.197

0,000

Valid

Y_3

0.719

0.197

0,000

Valid

Y_4

0.642

0.197

0,000

Valid

Y_5

0.785

0.197

0,000

Valid

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

 

ResultsReliability Test

Table 3. Reliability Test Results

Variable

Cronbach's Alpha

Results

Purchasing Quality (Y)

0.770

Reliable

Service Quality (X1)

0.769

Reliable

Brand Image (X2)

0.786

Reliable

Green Marketing (X3)

0.772

Reliable

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

            Based on Table3 above, shows that each item from each dependent variable, namely purchasing decisions, and the independent variables, namely service quality, brand image, and green marketing, have a Cronbach alpha's value greater than 0.60. So it can be concluded that the variable indicators of purchasing decisions (Y), service quality (X1), brand image (X2), and green marketing (X3), are all declared reliable or trustworthy as variable measuring instruments.

 

Classic assumption test

ResultsNormality test

The normality test is one of the requirements before carrying out regression testing. This test was carried out using the Kolmogorov – Smirnov test. The normality test results can be seen in Table 4 as follows:

 

Table 4. Normality Test Results

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

 

Unstandardized Residuals

N

100

Normal Parameters, b

Mean

,0000000

Std. Deviation

1.58998609

Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

,080

Positive

,062

Negative

-,080

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z

,804

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

,538

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

The normality test results in Table 4 using the One-Sample Kolomogorov-Smirnov Test obtained a significance value or Asymp Sig. (2-tailed) is 0.538 which is above 0.05 so it can be concluded that the data is normally distributed and suitable for use in the regression model.

 

Autocorrelation Test Results

The autocorrelation test is used to determine whether or not there are deviations from the classic assumption of autocorrelation, namely the correlation that occurs between the residuals in one observation and other observations in the regression model. The results of the autocorrelation test can be seen in Table 5 as follows:

 

 

 

 

Table 5. Autocorrelation Test Results

Model Summaryb

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Durbin-Watson

1

.714a

,509

,494

1.61464

2,095

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

            Table 5 shows that the value of Durbin-Watson (d) in this study is 2.095. This study used a sample size of 100 (n=100) with du (inner limit) = 1.758 and dl (outer limit) = 1.592. The upper limit of the du value for this study is 1.758 so 4-du is 2.242. Thus, it can be concluded that the d value of 2.095 is located between du and 4-du (1.758 < 2.095 < 2.242) so it can be concluded that there is no autocorrelation in the regression model used in this research.

 

Multicollinearity Test Results

Table 6. Multicollinearity Test Results

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

Q

Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

B

Std. Error

Beta

Tolerance

VIF

1

(Constant)

1,472

1,939

 

,759

,450

 

 

Service Quality

,193

,095

,171

2,031

,045

,725

1,379

Brand Image

,368

,085

,365

4,352

,000

,725

1,379

Green Marketing

,334

,082

,347

4,066

,000

,701

1,427

a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

The results of the multicollinearity test in Table 4.34 above show that all independent variables, namely suit quality, brand image and green marketing, have a tolerance value greater than 0.1 and the variance inflation factor (VIF) value is below 10, which means there are no symptoms. multicollinearity in this regression model. The service quality variable has a tolerance value of 0.725 and a VIF value of 1.379. For the brand image variable, it has a tolerance value of 0.725 and a VIF value of 1.379. Meanwhile, the green marketing variable has a tolerance value of 0.701 and a VIF value of 1.427.

 

Heteroscedasticity Test Results

Heteroscedasticity testing aims to test whether the regression model has unequal variance from the residuals of one observation to another. A good regression model isnot occurheteroscedasticity and to determine the presence of heteroscedasticity using the Glejser test. If the three independent variables are statistically significant and do not influence the dependent variable, then there is an indication that heteroscedasticity does not occur. The following are the results of the heteroscedasticity test on the regression model in this study:

 

 

 

 

Table 7. Heteroscedasticity Test Results

Corellations

Variable

Sig

Results

Service Quality

0.932

Not occurheteroscedasticity

Brand Image

0.946

Not occurheteroscedasticity

Green Marketing

0.910

Not occurheteroscedasticity

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

            Table 7 shows that all variables have a significant value greater than 0.05, so it can be concluded that the regression model in this study does not have heteroscedasticity.

 

Model Feasibility Test

Simultaneous Test Results (F test)

This technique is used to determine the influence of independent variables together on the dependent variable. To find out whether simultaneously, the regression coefficient of the independent variable has a real influence on the dependent variable or not.

 

Table 8. Simultaneous F Test Results

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

Df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

259,722

3

86,574

33,208

,000b

Residual

250,278

96

2,607

 

 

Total

510,000

99

 

 

 

a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision

b. Predictors: (Constant), Green Marketing, Brand Image, Service Quality

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

Table 8 shows the results of the simultaneous test or F test where the calculated F value was obtained at 33,208 with a significance level of .000. Because the significance level of the sig value is <0.05, this means that service quality, brand image and green marketing together influence purchasing decisions.

 

Coefficient of Determination (R2)

The purpose of this test is to find out how much the combination of independent variables is able to explain variations in the dependent variable. The results of the coefficient of determination test appear in Table 9.

 

Table 9. Coefficient of Determination Test Results

Model Summary b

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

,714a

,509

,494

1.61464

a. Predictors: (Constant), Green Marketing, Brand Image, Service Quality

b. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

Based on Table 9, the Adjusted R Square is 0.494, this means that the dependent variable, namely purchasing decisions, can be explained by independent variables which include service quality, brand image and green marketing at 49.4 percent, while the remaining 50.6 percent is explained by factors. other than the independent variables used in this research.

 

 

Partial Hypothesis Test Results (t test)

The partial t test is used to determine the effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. The partial t test is said to be significant if the sig value. each variable is no more than alpha (Sig. < 0.05). The results of the partial t test can be seen in Table 10 below:

Table 10. Partial t Test Results

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

Q

Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

 

B

Std. Error

Beta

Tolerance

VIF

 

1

(Constant)

1,472

1,939

 

,759

,450

 

 

 

Service Quality

,193

,095

,171

2,031

,045

,725

1,379

 

Brand Image

,368

,085

,365

4,352

,000

,725

1,379

 

Green Marketing

,334

,082

,347

4,066

,000

,701

1,427

 

a. Dependent Variable: Purchase Decision

Source: Process data with SPSS 24.0

 

The influence of each variable of service quality, brand image and green marketing on purchasing decisions can be seen from the direction and level of significance (probability).

Based on the calculation results in table 4.39, it is explained as follows:

1)  Testing the Service Quality Hypothesis (X1) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)

Based on the test results in table 4.39 above, it shows that the tcount value for the Service Quality variable (X1) is 2.031 with a significant value of 0.045, so the ttable value (α = 0.05) must be looked for which is 1.984, because the tcount value (2.031 > 1.984) with the level significant (0.045 < 0.05), then Ho is rejected, which means there is a positive and significant influence betweenService Quality (X1) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)

2)  Testing the Brand Image Hypothesis (X2) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)

Based on the test results in table 4.39 above, it shows that the tcount value for the Brand Image variable (X2) is 4.352 with a significant value of 0.000, so the ttable value (α = 0.05) must be looked for which is 1.984, because the tcount value (4.352 > 1.984) with the level significant (0.000 < 0.05), then Ho is rejected, which means there is a positive and significant influence betweenBrand Image (X2) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)

3)  Testing the Green Marketing Hypothesis (X3) on Purchasing Decisions (Y)

Based on the test results in table 4.39 above, it shows that the tcount value for the variableGreen Marketing(X3) is 4.066 with a significant value of 0.000, so you have to look for the ttable value (α = 0.05) which is 1.984, because the tcount value (4.066 > 1.984) has a significant level of (0.045 < 0.05), then Ho is rejected, which means there is a positive and significant influence betweenGreen Marketing(X3) on Purchase Decisions (Y).

 

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the research and discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn; (1) service quality has a positive and significant effect on consumer purchasing decisions, which means that if service quality is improved, purchasing decisions for The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta will increase, (2) brand image has a positive and significant effect on consumer purchasing decisions, which meaning that if a good company image is maintained, then purchasing decisions towards The Body Shop at the mall in South Jakarta will increase, and (3) green marketing has a positive and significant effect on consumer purchasing decisions, which means that if the company maintains and develops green marketing, then decisions purchases of The Body Shop at malls in South Jakarta will increase.

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

Ferrinadewi. (2008). Merek dan Psikologi Konsmen: Implikasi Pada StrategiPemasaran. Edisi 1. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Kotler, P. (2007). Marketing Manajemen. 12thed. Pearson Education. New Jersey. Terjemahan B. Sabran. 2010. Manajemen     Pemasaran. Edisi 12. PT.Indeks.Jakarta.

­­­_______________. (2012). Marketing Management. 12th ed. Global Edition Pearson         PrenticeHall. Terjemahan Teguh, H., R.A. Rusli dan B. Molan. Manajemen       Pemasaran. Edisi 12 . PT. Indeks. Jakarta.

Kusumawati, E. (2020). Commitment to the Teacher’s Loyalty as a Customer. In 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2019) (pp. 48-51). Atlantis Press.

Kusumawati, E. (2020). Leadership in Total Quality Management for Service Quality.

Peter & Olson . (2010). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy 9thed New York. Mc Graw  Hill­­­­.  USA. Terjemahan Lina Salim. 2012. Perilaku Konsumen dan Strategi          Pemasaran. Edisi 5.  Erlangga. Jakarta.

Paysal, S. (2016). Pengaruh Green Marketing Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada          Produk Nike di Bandung. Journal e-Proceeding of Science. 2(3) : 2442-5826.

Sangadji & Sopiah. (2013). Perilaku Konsumen : Pendekatan Praktis Disertai Himpunan Jurnal Penelitian. Edisi pertama. Andi. Yogyakarta.

Schiffman & Kanuk. (2007). Consumer Behavior. 15thed. Prentice-Hall Inc. New Jersey.  Terjemahan. Zulkifli   Kasip. 2008. Prilaku Konsumen. Edisi 7. PT Indexs. Jakarta.

Singh. Green Marketing: Opportunityfor Innovation and Sustainable          Development. Available at SSRN. :http://ssrn.com/abstract=1636622   http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636622.  15 september 2017 (15.20).

Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Edisi Revisi. Alfabeta. Bandung.

­­­­________. (2012). Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Edisi 20. Alfabeta. Bandung.

­­­________.(2013). Metode Penelitian Manajemen.  Edisi 1. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Sutisna. (2001). Perilaku Konsumen Dan Komunikasi Pemasaran. Edisi 1. Penerbit          PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

­­­­Tjiptono. F. (2012). Pemasaran Strategik. Edisi 2. Andi. Yogyakarta.

Weenas, J. R. S. (2013). Kualitas Produk, Harga, Promosi dan Kualitas Pelayanan,            Pengaruh         Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Spring Bed Comforta. Jurnal EMBA. 1(4): 607           618

William. (2011). Using Information Technology A Practical Introduction to Computers & Communications. 9thed. McGraw-Hill. New York. Terjemahan Iwan Sofana. 2012. Menggunakan Teknologi Informasi Pengantar Praktis untuk Komputer 7 Komunikasi. Edisi 9. Informatika. Jakarta.

Yanti, M. O. Z. & Sukotjo, H. (2016). Pengaruh Kesadaran Merek, Asosiasi Merek,          Dan Brand Image Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Aqua. Jurnal  ilmu dan            riset manajemen. 5(5) : 2461-0593.

Yazdanifard. (2011). The impact of Green Marketing on Customer satisfaction and Envi
         ronmental safety. 5thed. IACSIT Press. Singapore. Terjemahan B. Sabran. 2013. Dampak Green Marketing terhadap kepuasan pelanggan dan keamanan lingkungan. Edisi 5. Erlangga. Jakarta.
 
 

Copyright holder:

Amanda Rachmawati Rasyid, Resti Hardini, Kumba Digdowiseiso (2024)

 

First publication rights:

Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik

 

This article is licensed under the following:

WhatsApp Image 2021-06-26 at 17