Assessing Incentive-Based Motivation on Team Productivity by an Agent Based Model Presets and Task Difficulty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i1.263Keywords:
Agent-Based Model, Incentive-Based Motivation, Team Productivity, Task Difficulty, Work MotivationAbstract
Background: Team productivity is a critical factor in organizational performance and is strongly influenced by individual worker motivation and task characteristics.
Objective: This study investigates the impact of incentive-based motivation on team productivity under varying levels of task difficulty using an agent-based modeling (ABM) approach.
Methods: The model incorporates three core motivational dimensions—achievement motivation, affiliation motivation, and power motivation—along with individual ability levels to simulate task completion behavior within teams. A total of 20 worker agents were simulated across 27 different motivation profile combinations, with task difficulty values categorized into low, medium, and high levels. Each simulation was repeated 30 times to ensure robustness of the results. Productivity was measured based on task completion time, reflecting the collective contribution of team members.
Results: The simulation results indicate that motivation profiles significantly affect team productivity depending on task difficulty. For high task difficulty scenarios, teams composed of agents with high achievement and high power motivation demonstrated the fastest task completion times. In contrast, under low task difficulty conditions, agents with high achievement and high affiliation motivation performed more effectively. Medium task difficulty scenarios showed relatively balanced performance across most motivation profiles, with power motivation still contributing to faster completion times.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of aligning incentive-based motivation with task complexity to enhance team productivity. The study also demonstrates the usefulness of agent-based modeling as a tool for analyzing complex team dynamics and providing insights into optimal motivation-task matching strategies in organizational settings.
Downloads
References
Iskandar, R., Dugdale, J., Beck, E., & Cornou, C. (2024). Agent-based simulation of seismic crisis including human behavior: application to the city of Beirut, Lebanon. Simulation, 100(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497231194608
Shukla, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2022). Digital operations scheduling, workflow management, and performance measures of factors responsible for disruption in Industry 4.0 supply chain. IFAC PapersOnLine, 55(10), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.630
Datseris, G., Vahdati, A. R., & DuBois, T. C. (2022). Agents.jl: a performant and feature-full agent-based modeling software of minimal code complexity. Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497211068820
Li, N., Gao, C., Li, Y., & Liao, Q. (n.d.). Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activities. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4606937
Merrick, K. E., & Shafi, K. (2011). Achievement, affiliation, and power: Motive profiles for artificial agents. Adaptive Behavior, 19(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712310395953
Savin, I., Creutzig, F., Filatova, T., Foramitti, J., Konc, T., Niamir, L., Safarzynska, K., & van den Bergh, J. (2023). Agent-based modeling to integrate elements from different disciplines for ambitious climate policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.811
Turhanlar, E. E., Ekren, B. Y., & Lerher, T. (2024). Autonomous mobile robot travel under deadlock and collision prevention algorithms by agent-based modelling in warehouses. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(8), 1322–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2138290
Wang, Y., Bucher, E., Rocha, H., Jadhao, V., Metzcar, J., Heiland, R., Frieboes, H. B., & Macklin, P. (2024). Drug-loaded nanoparticles for cancer therapy: a high-throughput multicellular agent-based modeling study. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.588498
Banerjee, A. (2015). Integrating Human Motivation in Service Productivity. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3591–3598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.726
Haeckl, S., Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J.-R. (2024). Work motivation and teams. Economics Letters, 244, 112020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.112020
Kanze, D., Conley, M. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2021). The motivation of mission statements: How regulatory mode influences workplace discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 166, 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.002
Liu, Y., He, H., & Zhu, W. (2020). Motivational analyses of the relationship between negative affectivity and workplace helping behaviors: A Conservation of Resources perspective. Journal of Business Research, 108, 362–374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.019
Rodríguez, R., Roberts-Lombard, M., Høgevold, N. M., & Svensson, G. (2024). Proposing a sales performance motivational framework for B2B sellers in services firms. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100235
Tohidi, H. (2011). Teamwork productivity & effectiveness in an organization base on rewards, leadership, training, goals, wage, size, motivation, measurement and information technology. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.185
Iswara, L., Rozi, R. F., Istifar, V., Kalay, A. G., & Gunawan, F. E. (2021). Assessing Incentive- Based Motivation on the Team Productivity by an Agent-Based Model. In International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (Vol. 6, Issue 8). www.ijisrt.com
Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andy Gunawan, Nur Fadhila, Anastasia Sharleen, Suharjito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
