Risk Assessment of Safety Management System Implementation on the Training Ship Barombong Using the House of Risk Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i2.295Keywords:
Risk Assessment, House of Risk, Safety Management System, Maritime Risk Management, Shipping SafetyAbstract
Background: The shipping industry has a high level of operational risk, making the implementation of a safety management system a crucial aspect to ensure the safety of the crew, passengers, and ship operations. The Barombong Shipping Polytechnic Training Ship, as a means of education and pioneer transportation, also faces various potential risks that can affect the effectiveness of the implementation of the Safety Management System (SMS).
Objective: This study aims to analyze the influence of risk assessment using the House of Risk method on the implementation of the SMS on the Barombong Training Ship and to identify the dominant risk factors affecting operational safety.
Method: This research used a descriptive analytical approach with the House of Risk method through the stages of identifying risk events and risk agents, assessing risk probability and impact, and calculating the Risk Priority Number (RPN) to determine mitigation priorities. Data were obtained through field observations, interviews with ship crew, documentation studies, and analysis of Safety Management System reports.
Result: The research results indicate that several main risks in SMS implementation include non-conformity with safety procedures, lack of training and emergency drills, and suboptimal safety documentation. Risks with the highest RPN values become the top priority in the mitigation strategy.
Conclusion: The application of the House of Risk method is proven to help identify, prioritize, and design risk control strategies more systematically, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of Safety Management System implementation and supporting a safety culture on the Barombong Training Ship.
Downloads
References
Baig, M. Z., Lagdami, K., & Iqbal, K. M. J. (2025). Maritime Governance Analysis for Domestic Ferry Safety and Sustainability by Employing Principles, Criteria and Indicators (PCIs) Framework. Sustainability, 17(21), 9426.
Bubicz, M. E., Moreira, C., Ferasso, M., Sellitto, M. A., Carvalho, A., & Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D. (2026). Risk Management assessment of social sustainability in supply chains: a Bayesian Network model proposal. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 1–26.
Cicek, K. (2026). Marine engineering systems failure analysis using extended failure modes and effects analysis with quality function deployment: maritime house of reliability. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 43(2), 516–538.
Esad Demirci, S. M., & Cicek, K. (2023). Innovative strategy development approach for enhancing the effective implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code. Transportation Research Record, 2677(1), 25–48.
Hasanah, S. U., Santosa, P. I., & Ferdiana, R. (2025). House of Risk Phase 1: A Tool for Identifying and Prioritizing Software Development Risk Agents. 2025 International Conference on Advancement in Data Science, E-Learning and Information System (ICADEIS), 1–6.
Mardiana, M., Laksmana, B., Harmuzan, H., Sukardi, S., & Genawi, A. (2026). Strategic Sea Transportation Management: A Comprehensive Framework for Competitive Advantage Through Regulatory Excellence and Workforce Optimization. Tren Digital Publishing.
McKinnon, R. C. (2025). The Design, Implementation, and Audit of Health and Safety Management Systems. CRC Press.
Moreno, F. C., Gonzalez, J. R., Muro, J. S., & Maza, J. A. G. (2022). Relationship between human factors and a safe performance of vessel traffic service operators: A systematic qualitative-based review in maritime safety. Safety Science, 155, 105892.
Nyoman Pujawan, I., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967.
Organization, I. M. (2018). International Safety Management (ISM) Code with Guidelines for Its Implementation. International Maritime Organization.
Oyekanmi, O. E., & Onwumere, A. A. (2025). Safety, Environmental Compliance, and Risk Management in Offshore Operations. NIPES-Journal of Energy Technology and Environment, 7(4), 279–299.
Şentürk, M., Özdinç, Ö., Topal, M. H., Başpınar, A., Cergibozan, R., Mengüç, K., & Durmuş, A. (2026). A Conceptual Co-Design Co-Create Framework for Citizen Engagement in Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience. Sustainability, 18(9), 4596.
Singh, M. P., & Raju, T. B. (2024). Unveiling the shadows of the maritime industry: A comprehensive review of shipping accidents and preventative measures. Journal of Maritime Research, 21(3), 91–100.
Supriatna, A., Laksmana, B., Mardiana, M., Sohriadhana, R., & Arif, M. D. (2026). Modern Sea Transportation Operations: A Hands-On Guide for Maritime Managers and Operations Personnel. Tren Digital Publishing.
Tarigan, M. E. N. B., & Mege, S. R. (2025). Risk Analysis Using the House of Risk Method on Inbound Activities in the Raw Material Warehouse of a Cup Noodle Manufacturing Plant, Semarang, Indonesia. International Journal of Industrial Management, 19(4), 210–220.
Wang, K., Qiu, R., Chen, H., Liu, X., Wang, H., & Liu, J. (2025). Deep learning enables safety concerns of fuel ignition recognition in thermal-hydrodynamic process with ship motion-sloshing interaction. Applied Thermal Engineering, 127467.
Xi, Y., Wang, Z., Hu, S., Han, B., & Yin, J. (2025). The effect of safety culture on the safety behavior of ship deck officers-empirical evidence from shipping industry. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, 1599455.
Yercan, F., Cetin, O., & Conguloglu, R. (2026). The economic impact of piracy: a critical assessment of maritime security and trade disruptions in the Gulf of Guinea. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1–25.
Zulfiadi, Z., Arhami, A., & Fradinata, E. (2025). Risk mitigation analysis with the house of risk (HOR) method approach in the service procurement process. Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(3), 513–529.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rina Haryani, Sidrotul Muntaha, Yudi Satria, Rachmat Tjahjanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
