Institutional Decoupling in Archipelagic Logistics: Why Global Standards Do Not Strengthen Digital Policy Effectiveness in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i3.333Keywords:
National Logistics Ecosystem, Institutional Decoupling, Institutional Isomorphism, Logistics Service Performance, Port Ecosystem, Mixed MethodsAbstract
Background: As an archipelagic nation, Indonesia faces complex logistics challenges, including limited connectivity, infrastructure disparities, and high inter regional distribution costs. In response, the government and industry stakeholders have adopted various global best practices in digital logistics transformation, yet their implementation often fails to produce the expected outcomes.
Objective: This study analyses the effect of National Logistics Ecosystem (NLE) policy implementation on logistics service performance, with digitalization, digital ecosystem maturity, and openness to global best practices as moderating variables, and explains why openness to global best practices does not strengthen that effect.
Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory sequential design. Quantitative data from 388 respondents were analyzed using SmartPLS 4 and NVivo 14.
Results: NLE policy implementation positively and significantly affects logistics service performance, and this effect is strengthened by digitalization and digital ecosystem maturity. In contrast, openness to global best practices neither moderates the relationship nor exerts a significant direct effect on performance. Qualitative analysis attributes this dual null result to Institutional Decoupling, whereby international standards are formally adopted without operational internalization, driven by inter agency sectoral fragmentation and pronounced infrastructure disparities between western and eastern Indonesia, and compounded by uneven digital literacy and conservative organizational cultures.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that, absent foundational domestic harmonization, international standards remain ceremonial and lose operational relevance. A sequenced, domestic first approach is therefore required, one that couples regulatory measures to dismantle sectoral silos with investment in digital literacy and human resource capacity.
Downloads
References
Arimbhi, P., Agustina, D., & Rahmi, N. (2021). The Effectiveness of the National Logistic Ecosystem Program in Improving the Performance of the National Logistics System, Recovering the Investment Climate, and Increasing the Competitiveness of the National Economy. In Jurnal Logistik Indonesia (Vol. 5, Number 2). http://ojs.stiami.ac.id
Beamish, P. W., & Chakravarty, D. (2021). Using the Resource-Based View in Multinational Enterprise Research. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1861–1877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321995575
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed., Ed.). SAGE Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Gayatri, G., Jaya, I. G. N. M., & Rumata, V. M. (2023). The Indonesian Digital Workforce Gaps in 2021–2025. Sustainability, 15(1), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010754
Hafiz, A., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2024). Analisis Dampak Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pada Efisiensi Proses Bisnis. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(1).
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed., Ed.). Cengage Learning.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
IMO. (2024). Amendments to the Annex to the Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic (FAL Convention) (Resolution FAL.14(46)).
Jazuli, M. R., Idris, M. M., & Yaguma, P. (2022). The importance of institutional quality: Reviewing the relevance of Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on national competitiveness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01343-w
Kesavan, D. P., & Deif, A. M. (2021). Exploring national culture impact on logistics performance. Transportation Journal, 60(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.60.1.0020
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4).
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption Of An Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293
Liu, Y., Kim, S., & Sun, J. (2024). The implications of smart logistics policy on corporate performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36623
Mai, V. N., Nguyen, Q. N., & Nguyen, Q. D. (2022). Factors impacting logistics performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(4), 1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.6.015
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses To Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
Perekonomian, K. K. B. (2023). Layanan National Logistics Ecosystem terus dikembangkan pemerintah untuk menunjang keberhasilan reformasi logistik 4.0. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia.
Poppy, Y. R., & Indrawan, H. R. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian: Konsep, Teknik, dan Aplikasi. PT. Refika Aditama.
Song, Z. Y., Lin, C. W., Feng, X., & Lee, P. T. W. (2024). An empirical study of the performance of the sixth generation ports model with smart ports with reference to major container ports in mainland China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 184, 103460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103460
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Ulkhaq, M. M., & Pratiwi, T. N. (2025). Analysis of Indonesia’s Position in the 2023 Logistics Performance Index. Science and Education, 4, 581–587.
UNCTAD. (2023). Review of Maritime Transport 2023: Towards a green and just transition (UNCTAD/RMT/2023).
Utama, D. R., Hamsal, M., Abdinagoro, S. B., & Rahim, R. K. (2024). Developing a digital transformation maturity model for port assessment in archipelago countries: The Indonesian case. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101146
Wijen, F., Prado, A., King, A., Saka-Helmhout, A., Gray, B., Dalpiaz, E., De Vries, H., Van Wijk, J., Phillips, N., Heugens, P., Van Tulder, R., & Reus, T. (2014). Means Versus Ends In Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading Off Compliance And Achievement In Sustainability Standard Adoption 1(3) (after copy-edits).
World Bank. (2023). World Bank Releases Logistics Performance Index 2023.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis.
Zhou, H., Wang, Q., Li, L., Teo, T. S. H., & Yang, S. (2023). Supply chain digitalization and performance improvement: a moderated mediation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(6), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2022-0434
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ibnu Romadhona, Rully Indrawan , Euis Saribanon , Siti Maemunah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




