APIP Authority and Public Accountability: Institutional Effectiveness in DKI Jakarta Provincial Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i2.337Keywords:
Internal Audit, Public Accountability, SPIP, Governance, APIP, DKI JakartaAbstract
Background: …
Objective: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) authority in enhancing accountability within the Provincial Government of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta.
Methods: The research employs a qualitative approach using normative-institutional analysis and public policy review. Data were examined through document analysis, APIP capability reports, SPIP maturity evaluations, and recent academic literature.
Results: The findings reveal that the effectiveness of APIP authority is not solely determined by regulatory power, but by institutional capacity, auditor independence, leadership commitment, SPIP maturity, and risk-based supervisory integration. Although APIP authority in Jakarta is normatively adequate, its implementation faces structural challenges, including limited human resources, bureaucratic intervention, and weak follow-up on audit recommendations. Strengthening APIP capability to Level 3 and above, transforming supervisory culture, and implementing digital internal audit systems are key determinants of sustainable public accountability improvement.
Conclusion: The study concludes that internal oversight reform must be oriented toward integrity-based governance and risk management frameworks.
Downloads
References
Adi, A. (2025). Pengaruh Penerapan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Polewali Mandar The Influence Implementation Control Intern To Quality Audit On Inspectorate Regency Poewali Mandar. Universitas Sulawesi Barat.
Amalia, M. M. (2023). Enhancing Accountability And Transparency In The Public Sector: A Comprehensive Review Of Public Sector Accounting Practices. The Es Accounting And Finance, 1(03), 160–168.
Andi, R. S., & Wijaya, H. (2025). Analisis Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Se- Indonesia. Jurnal Liabilitas, 10(2), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.54964/Liabilitas.V10i2.494
Bank, W. (2020). Indonesia Public Expenditure Review: Spending For Better Results. World Bank Washington.
Betta, A. (2020). Pengaruh Komitmen Perangkat Daerah, Peran Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Efektifitas Penyelenggaraan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Wahana Riset Akuntansi.
BPKP. (2023). Laporan Kinerja BPKP Tahun 2023.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). Balancing Governance Capacity And Legitimacy: How The Norwegian Government Handled The COVID‐19 Crisis As A High Performer. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 774–779.
De Vries, M., & Nemec, J. (2013). Public Sector Reform: An Overview Of Recent Literature And Research On Npm And Alternative Paths. International Journal Of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16.
De Vries, M. S., & Nemec, J. (2026). Debate: Thirty Five Years Of Public Sector Reform In Central Europe. Public Money & Management, 46(1), 3–4.
Dewi, H. A. (2022). Independensi Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah Guna Pelaksanaan Good Governance Berbasis Cacm Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Daerah. Arena Hukum, 15(2), 399–422.
Dickson, H., Vamakas, G., Stahl, D., Short, R., Wickersham, A., Jolliffe, D., & Blackwood, N. (2026). Trajectories Of Offending: An Administrative Data Linkage Study In England And Wales. The British Journal Of Criminology, Azag038.
Falka, A. R., Sari, E., & Yusrizal, Y. (2022). Efektifitas Pelaksaan Koordinasi Aparatur Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah Dengan Penegak Hukum Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Pemerintah. Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 10(2), 340–362.
Firmansyah, H. (2025). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparatur Desa Dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) Pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Jurnalis (Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ilmu Bisnis), 6(1), 1–11.
Getie Mihret, D., & Wondim Yismaw, A. (2007). Internal Audit Effectiveness: An Ethiopian Public Sector Case Study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710750757
Government At A Glance 2023. (2023). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-En
Hartanti, R., Bleskadit, N. H., Judijanto, L., & Yossinomita, Y. (2026). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Hendriawan, S. J., Sujianto, S., Albintani, M., & As’ Ar, H. (2026). Analysis Of Policy Implementation In Supervision And Prevention Of Fraud: A Review In The Riau Provincial Government Environment. Sinergi, 1(1), 388–398.
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A Government That Worked Better And Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades Of Reform And Change In Uk Central Government. OUP Oxford.
Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S. J., & Berliner, D. (2024). Transnational Approaches To Improving Public Services: The Case Of The Open Government Partnership. In Pathways To Positive Public Administration (Pp. 300–319). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jatmiko, B. (2020). Pengaruh Pengawasan Internal, Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sleman (Survei Pada Seluruh Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Sleman). Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(2), 231–246.
Jiwayanti, N., Abror, M. D., & Pramono, T. (2024). Pengawasan Kinerja Aparatur Daerah Melalui Audit Kinerja Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (Apip). Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 49–66.
Mangallo, E., Baharuddin, B., & Lambe, K. H. P. (2025). Efektivitas Tugas Dan Fungsi Pengawas Penyelenggaraan Urusan Pemerintahan Daerah Di Inspektorat Provinsi Papua Tengah. Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal, 3(2), 284–298.
Manurung, M., & Rahman, A. (2026). Efektivitas Pengawasan Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Terhadap Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Kabupaten Asahan. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 19(01), 66–77.
Mardiasmo, M. B. A. (2021). Akuntansi Sektor Publik-Edisi Terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
Masoud, N. (2025). Moderating Effect Of Sustainable Innovation On Internal Audit Effectiveness And Sustainability Auditing Practices: Evidence From Libya’s Public Sector. International Journal Of Financial Studies, 13(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/Ijfs13020069
Miao, Q., Ahmad, J., & Villadsen, A. R. (2026). Shaping The Crisis Management‐Public Administration Nexus: A Systematic Review And Future Research Agenda. Review Of Policy Research, 43(2), E70039.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage.
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. (2022). Exploration Of Coding In Qualitative Data Analysis: Grounded Theory Perspective.
Moss, S., & Buachoom, W. W. (2026). The Influence Of Government Budgets For Anti-Corruption Efforts And Government Effectiveness On National Transparency Levels. Journal Of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 1–28.
Nadirsyah, Indriani, M., & Mulyany, R. (2024). Enhancing Fraud Prevention And Internal Control: The Key Role Of Internal Audit In Public Sector Governance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2382389
Nainggolan, C. S., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2019). Analisis Determinan Auditor Internal Pada Efektivitas Audit Internal Sektor Publik (Studi Pada Inspektorat Provinsi DKI Jakarta). Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 8(4).
Nurfalah, M. A., & Kartikasari, L. (2025). Optimalisasi Peran Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Dalam Mencegah Potensi Kerugian Keuangan Negara/Daerah (Studi Kasus Inspektorat Kabupaten Bojonegoro). Jurnal Acitya Ardana, 5(2), 82–95.
OECD 2020. (2020). OECD Public Integrity Handbook. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/Ac8ed8e8-En
OECD 2016. (2016). Open Government In Indonesia. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265905-En
OECD 2023. (2023). Government At A Glance 2023. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-En
Power, M. (2021). Modelling The Micro-Foundations Of The Audit Society: Organizations And The Logic Of The Audit Trail. Academy Of Management Review, 46(1), 6–32.
Power, M. (2026). Economy Of Traces: Traceability, Tracking, And The Accounts We Live By. Oxford University Press.
Pradifta, A. E. (2022). Kebijakan Pengawasan Untuk Efektivitas Penanganan Pengaduan Masyarakat Ada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(4), 6990–7006.
Prima, A. (2025). Efektivitas Kinerja Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Bidang Pengawasan Kinerja Dan Keuangan Pada Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal.
Puspa, D. F., & Prasetyo, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pemerintah Desa, Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Dan Aksesibilitas Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 20(2), 281–298.
Rahmasari, A., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Maturity Of Internal Control System, The Capability Of Internal Auditors, And Performance Accountability In Local Governments. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 8(2), 159–176.
Saputra, A. A. S. (2021). Peran Aparatur Pengawas Internal Pemerintah Sebagai Pengendali Mutu Dan Penjamin Kualitas Dalam Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 4(2).
Sitorus, L., & Wibowo, P. (2025). Determinants Of Government Internal Audit Quality Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kualitas Audit Internal Pemerintah.
Suci, F. (2026). Analisis Kompetensi Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (Apip) Dalam Mendukung Tata Kelola Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pada Inspektorat Pesisir Barat).
Sukma, D. G. (2024). Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah Daerah Oleh Inspektorat Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Yang Baik (Good Governance) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Dinamika Hukum, 15(1).
Suling, F. C. P. J. (2024). Efektivitas Pengawasan Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri Dalam Pembinaan Dan Pengawasan Gubernur Atas Pelaksanaan Tugas Bupati/Walikota Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Public Administration Journal (PAJ), 8(2), 1–15.
Sumanti, R. (2020). Saputra, A. A. S. (2021). Peran Aparatur Pengawas Internal Pemerintah Sebagai Pengendali Mutu Dan Penjamin Kualitas Dalam Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Ilmu Hukum Prima, 4(2). Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(2), 137–158.
Turetken, O., Jethefer, S., & Ozkan, B. (2020). Internal Audit Effectiveness: Operationalization And Influencing Factors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 238–271.
Umam, M. S., & Setiyowati, A. D. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Transparansi, Komitmen Aparatur, Kepatuhan Pada Regulasi Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur Daerah. Infestasi, 19(1), 91–102.
Wijaya, H. (2025). Analisis Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Se-Indonesia. Jurnal Liabilitas, 10(2), 51–72.
Yanti, N. K. W. K., Dewi, A. A. A. E. T., & Jayanti, L. G. P. S. E. (2025). Pengaruh Aksesibilitas Laporan Keuangan, Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Dan Kompetensi Aparatur Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Kecamatan Jembrana, Kabupaten Jembrana. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Warmadewa, 6(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ronny Berty Talapessy, Murtir Jeddawi, Hyronimus Rowa, Baharuddin Thahir

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



