Road Safety Study in Accident-Prone Areas on the Gading - Playen and Yogyakarta - Barongan Road Sections

Authors

  • Raafi Widyaputra Yulianyahya Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Ghefra Rizkan Gaffara Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Ansadilla Niar Sitanggang Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Irma Damayantie Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i3.338

Keywords:

Road safety, Accident-prone areas, Infrastructure, Education, Driver behavior

Abstract

Background: The background of this research stems from the high number of accidents occurring on this road section, which endangers the safety of road users.

Objective: This study aims to analyze traffic safety on two road sections with high accident rates, namely the Gading–Playen Road and the Yogyakarta–Barongan Road.

Methods: The research methods employed include field surveys, collection of primary and secondary data, and statistical analysis using the CUSUM method and the V/C (volume-to-capacity) ratio.

Results: The analysis revealed Gading–Playen Road section has a capacity of 3,354 pcu/hour with a V/C ratio of 0.196, indicating stable traffic conditions, while the Yogyakarta–Barongan Road section has a capacity of 3,444 pcu/hour with a V/C ratio of 0.771, reflecting near-saturated traffic conditions and a higher-risk situation. Z-score analysis of accident data from 2016 to 2019 showed a sharp spike on the Yogyakarta–Barongan section in the third period (z = +1.55), while the Gading–Playen section recorded a significant decline (z = −1.13). Accidents on both sections predominantly involve motorcycle users and male victims aged 16–25 years, and are primarily caused by undisciplined driving behavior. Key recommendations include geometric road improvements, installation of adequate traffic signs, improved road lighting, and strengthened enforcement of traffic regulations.

Conclusion: The integration of CUSUM, Z score, and V/C ratio methods provides an effective framework for identifying and assessing traffic accident risks. The findings reveal distinct risk characteristics between road sections, requiring targeted interventions based on geometric conditions, traffic intensity, and behavioral factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

da Silva, A. R., & Cavalcante, R. N. (2025). Average speed dynamics on urban roads and highways: Influence of traffic infrastructure, vehicle and road characteristics on driving behavior. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 101591.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, K. P. R. I. (2023). Pedoman Kapasitas Jalan Indonesia. Kementerian PUPR.

Elvik, R., Høye, A., Vaa, T., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The Handbook Of Road Safety Measures. In Elsevier.

Geng, Z., Ji, X., Cao, R., Lu, M., & Qin, W. (2022). A Conflict Measures-Based Extreme Value Theory Approach To Predicting Truck Collisions And Identifying High-Risk Scenes On Two-Lane Rural Highways. Sustainability, 14(18).

Goel, R., Tiwari, G., Varghese, M., Bhalla, K., Agrawal, G., Saini, G., Jha, A., John, D., Saran, A., & White, H. (2024). Effectiveness Of Road Safety Interventions: An Evidence And Gap Map. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(1), E1367.

Harianto, D., & Radam, I. (2019). Identification And Analysis On Causes Of Traffic Accident Factors In The Urban Roads In Paringin. Global Journal Of Engineering Science Research, 6(August).

Hashim, I. H., Badawy, R. M., & Heneash, U. (2023). Impact of pavement defects on traffic operational performance. Sustainability, 15(10), 8293.

Indonesia, P. P. R. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Bidang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Jenderal, D., Marga, B., Direktorat, S., Bina, J., Direktur, P., Bina, J., Kepala, P., Kerja, S., & Bina, J. (2023). No. 09/P/Bm/2023 (Issue 09).

Kalae, F. A., Kuswara, K. M., & Edyan, R. (2025). Analisis Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Dikecamatan Teluk Mutiara Kota Kalabahi. Jurnal Teknologi, 19(1), 24–33.

Kronprasert, N., Boontan, K., & Kanha, P. (2021). Crash Prediction Models For Horizontal Curve Segments On Two-Lane Rural Roads In Thailand. Sustainability, 13(16), 1–18.

Lepoglavec, K., Šušnjar, M., Pandur, Z., Bačić, M., Kopseak, H., & Nevečerel, H. (2023). Correct Calculation Of The Existing Longitudinal Profile Of A Forest/Skid Road Using Gnss And A UAV Device. Forests, 14(4).

Martin, D. A., & Bombaerts, G. (2026). Mapping Engineering Students’ Conceptions Of Responsibility In Challenge‐Based Learning: The Agency Gap. Journal Of Engineering Education, 115(2), E70057.

Mei, A., Zampetti, E., P, D. M., Fontinovo, G., Papa, P., & D’andrea, A. (2022). Roads—Rover For Bituminous Pavement Distress Survey: An Unmanned Ground Vehicle (Ugv) Prototype For Pavement Distress Evaluation. Sensors, 22(9).

Mekonnen, A. A., & Sipos, T. (2022). Crash Prediction Models And Methodological Issues. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 50(3), 267–272.

Mitra, S., & Washington, S. (2016). On The Nature Of Over-Dispersion In Motor Vehicle Crash Prediction Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 91, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Aap.2016.02.020

Mohammed, S., & Ali, H. (2021). Road Safety And Public Perception: A Study Of User Feedback. Journal Of Safety Research, 75.

Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2010). Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John Wiley & Sons.

Organization, W. H. (2020). Global Status Report On Road Safety 2020. WHO.

Organization, W. H. (2023). Pedestrian Safety: A Road Safety Manual For Decision-Makers And Practitioners. World Health Organization.

Samsudin, I. (2020). Analisa Faktor Penyebab Kecelakaan Pada Ruas Jalan Ir. H. Alala Kota Kendari Ditinjau Dari Prasarana Dan Geometrik Jalan. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 21(1), 59–66.

Schweppenhäuser, M., Schrab, K., Protzmann, R., & Radusch, I. (2025). Evaluating Spatiotemporal Speed Metrics For Traffic State Estimation On Complex Urban Roads. Simulation, 101(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241308890

Sharma, A., & Gupta, R. (2020). Traffic Volume Studies And Their Importance In Transportation Planning. International Journal Of Traffic And Transportation Engineering, 9(3), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.5923/J.Ijtte.20200903.01

Sharma, S., & Choudhary, P. (2026). Which Factors Compromise Safety On Mountainous Roads: A Systematic Review. Journal Of Traffic And Transportation Engineering (English Edition).

Simanungkalit, R. R. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Pengguna Jalan Dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Bidang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan Perspektif Maqasid Asy-Syari ‘Ah. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Sum, S., Wisutwattanasak, P., Champahom, T., Jomnonkwao, S., & Ratanavaraha, V. (2026). Predicting Motorcycle Crash Severity On Thailand’s Curved Roadways: A Deep Learning Approach. Iatss Research, 50(1), 786–800.

Syahriza, M. (2019). Kecelakaan Lalulintas: Perlukah Mendapatkan Perhatian Khusus? Averrous: Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan Malikussaleh, 5(2), 89.

Tang, F., Fu, X., Cai, M., Lu, Y., & Zhong, S. (2021). Investigation Of The Factors Influencing The Crash Frequency In Expressway Tunnels: Considering Excess Zero Observations And Unobserved Heterogeneity. IEEE Access, 9, 58549–58565.

Transportasi, P. L. P. (2004). Penanganan Lokasi Rawan Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas. Pusat Litbang Prasarana Transportasi.

Zhang, L., Huang, Z., Zhu, L., & Yang, S. (2025). Investigating Influential Factors Through Crash Frequency Models Considering Excess Zeros And Heterogeneity: New Insights Into Mountain Freeway Safety. Plos One, 20(4), E0320135.

Zhang, P., Wang, C., Chen, F., Cui, S., Cheng, J., & Bo, W. (2022). A Random-Parameter Negative Binomial Model For Assessing Freeway Crash Frequency By Injury Severity: Daytime Versus Nighttime. Sustainability, 14(15).

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17