Cost and Time Efficiency Comparison of RISHA and Conventional Construction for Type 36 Post-Disaster Housing in Rua Village, Ternate

Rais D. Hi Yusuf; Joni Hermanto; Muhammad Yusri Abdul  Gani

doi:10.59261/jequi.v8i3.366

Authors

Rais D. Hi Yusuf Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara
Joni Hermanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara
Muhammad Yusri Abdul Gani Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i3.366

Keywords:

RISHA, Conventional Construction, Cost Analysis, Implementation Time

Abstract

Background: The increasing demand for rapid, affordable, and reliable housing has encouraged innovation in construction methods, including the RISHA modular system. However, its cost and time efficiency compared with conventional construction remain debated, especially in post-disaster and remote areas.

Objective: This study aims to compare the construction costs and implementation time of the RISHA (Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat) modular construction method and the conventional construction method for a Type 36 single-story house.

Methods: This research employed a comparative quantitative approach. Data analysis included: (1) calculating work volume for each work category, (2) conducting unit price analysis based on the Ministry of Public Works and Housing’s Standard Unit Price Analysis (Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan, AHSP) and Regional Standard Unit Prices (Harga Satuan Pokok Kegiatan, HSPK), (3) preparing the Cost Budget Plan (Rencana Anggaran Biaya, RAB), and (4) calculating implementation time using the work coefficient method.

Results: The results show that the RISHA method required a total cost of IDR 167,918,089.00 and an implementation duration of 56 working days, or 8 weeks. Meanwhile, the conventional method incurred a cost of IDR 172,562,093.00 and required 75 working days, or 11 weeks. Thus, RISHA construction provided cost savings of 2.69% and time efficiency of 25% compared with the conventional method. Although the cost of the RISHA superstructure was higher due to the use of precast components, significant savings in foundation and wall work, along with an accelerated construction timeline, made RISHA a more efficient overall alternative.

Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that the RISHA method offers advantages in cost and time efficiency for constructing a simple Type 36 house in the context of this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afkhamiaghda, M., & Elwakil, E. (2023). Challenges Review Of Decision Making In Post-Disaster Construction. International Journal Of Construction Management, 23(14), 2409–2418.

Agarwalla, N., & Parida, P. K. (2026). The Role Of Adaptive Governance In Disaster Risk Reduction: A Review Study On The State Of Odisha, India. Climate And Development, 1–13.

Alsaadi, O., & Acar, E. (2021). Challenges Of Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects: An Empirical Investigation According To Project Management Knowledge Areas. American Journal Of Management, 21(4), 67–77.

Bencana, B. N. P. (2024). Banjir Bandang Melanda Kota Ternate, 13 Orang Meninggal Dunia. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. https://BNPB.Go.Id/Berita/Banjir-Bandang-Melanda-Kota-Ternate-13-Orang-Meninggal-Dunia

Gunata, R. D. P., & Pratama, Y. M. (2023). Analisa Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Hunian Dengan Metode Konvensional, Risha Dan Ruspin.

Haigh, R., & Li, L. (2026). Decade Review Of Modular Construction Systems In The Building And Construction Industry: Research Trends Toward The Development And Utilisation Of Timber Materials Within The Context Of A Circular Economy. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 1–20.

Hidayat, R., & Prasetyo, A. (2020). Comparative Cost Analysis Of Prefabricated Versus Conventional Housing In West Java. Journal Of Construction Engineering, 15(2), 115–129.

Liu, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Construction Production Systems: A Review Of The Impacts Of Modularization. International Journal Of Project Management, 39(5), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Ijproman.2021.03.004

Muliawan, I. A. (2018). Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pembangunan Struktur Rumah Sederhana: Sistem Risha Vs Sistem Konvensional. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Mulyawan, Z. H., Wimala, M., & Carissa, C. (2023). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah: Penerapan Teknologi Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (Risha) Di Indonesia. Rekaracana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 9(2), 100.

Nugroho, B. (2022). Evaluation Of Risha Modular Housing In Palu Post-Earthquake Reconstruction. Indonesian Journal Of Architecture And Construction, 12(1), 45–60.

Pratama, Y. M., & Gunata, R. D. P. (2023). Analisis Biaya Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Hunian Dengan Metode Konvensional, Risha, Dan Ruspin. Jurnal Teknik Sipil.

PUPR, K. (2021). Evaluasi Implementasi Program Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (Risha) Di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Perumahan.

Putri, S., & Lestari, D. (2024). Sensitivity Analysis Of Logistics Factors In Prefabricated Housing Projects. Construction Logistics Review, 9(3), 202–219.

Rahman, H., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Challenges Of Conventional Construction In Post-Disaster Settings. Disaster Management Journal, 8(4), 331–347.

Rakyat, K. P. U. Dan P. (2016). Pedoman Teknis Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (Risha). Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Ruanda, H., Cakrawala, M., & Aditya, C. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Metode Konvensional Dan Pracetak: Studi Kasus: Cluster Villa Puncak Landung Sari Malang. Bouwplank Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 5(1), 30–39.

Salim, M. A., Siswanto, A. B., Hartono, & Rozaq, B. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Waktu Dan Biaya Penggunaan Teknologi Risha Dan Metode Konvensional Pada Proyek Perumahan. Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur Hexagon, 6(2), 83–90. https://Jurnal.Unmuhjember.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Hexagon/Article/View/6106

Sulistiana, P. D., Agustini, N. K. A., & Setiawan, I. M. E. (2024a). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Struktur Rumah Konvensional Dengan Risha Di Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13(1), 78–86.

Sulistiana, P. D., Agustini, N. K. A., & Setiawan, I. M. E. (2024b). Perbandingan Konstruksi Beton Risha Dan Konvensional: Tinjauan Biaya Dan Waktu.

Suryadi, A., Wibowo, M., & Taufik, R. (2021). Socio-Economic Impacts Of Delayed Housing Reconstruction After Natural Disasters. Asian Social Science Review, 7(2), 88–102.

UNDRR. (2020). The Human Cost Of Disasters: An Overview Of The Last 20 Years (2000-2019). United Nations Office For Disaster Risk Reduction.

Waris, A., Meilawaty, O., & Puspasari, V. H. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Struktur Pembangunan Rumah Dengan Metode Risha Dan Konvensional Di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan, Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil.

Wicaksono, B., Santoso, D., & Wijaya, F. (2023). Rapid Modular Housing Installation (Risha) In Earthquake-Affected Areas: Time-Efficiency Analysis. Journal Of Disaster Resilience, 14(1), 73–90.