Key Success Factors Affecting the Cost Performance of Value Engineering-Based Green Retrofitting on Rivers Using Envision Guidelines

Authors

  • Nela Devila Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Albert Eddy Husin Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i4.402

Keywords:

Cost Performance, Envision, Green Retrofitting, River, Value Engineering

Abstract

Background: Rivers in Indonesia face serious challenges related to water quality and river management due to weak infrastructure governance, highlighting the need for cost-effective river restoration.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the key success factors influencing the cost performance of Value Engineering (VE)-based green river retrofits guided by Envision v3.

Method: The study employed a quantitative survey method involving 68 respondents, including project managers, field engineers, supervisors, consultants, and Watershed Authority personnel. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25. Three independent variables (river characteristics (X1), Envision guidelines (X2), and Value Engineering practices (X3)) were examined for their effects on cost performance (Y). All constructs demonstrated strong reliability and validity.

Results: The results confirmed that X1, X2, and X3 significantly and jointly influenced cost performance (F= 9.422; p < .001), yielding the regression equation: Y = 4.398 + 0.046(X1) + 0.045(X2) + 0.135(X3). Value Engineering exerted the strongest influence, as indicated by the highest regression coefficient (0.135). The ten most influential success factors identified through the mean rank analysis were predominantly associated with the Value Engineering dimension, particularly cost savings identification, functional clarity, structured planning, and top management commitment.

Conclusion: The results demonstrate that disciplined Value Engineering practices can significantly improve the cost performance of green river retrofit projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nela Devila, Universitas Mercu Buana

Master's student in Civil Engineering at Mercu Buana University

References

Aghimien, D. O., Oke, A. E., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2018). Barriers to the adoption of value management in developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(7), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2017-0070

Al-Ghamdi, M. A., & Al-Gahtani, K. S. (2022). Integrated Value Engineering and Life Cycle Cost Modeling for HVAC System Selection. Sustainability, 14(4), 2126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042126

Arif, E. J., & Husin, A. E. (2024). Implementation of green river retrofitting concept using Blockchain-BIM for cost performance. SINERGI, 28(3), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.22441/sinergi.2024.3.012

Bai, W., Wang, J., & Yu, X. (2026). Measurement and spatiotemporal evolution of the green resilience index of the construction industry in Chinese provinces. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(10), 8512–8542.

Basak, S. M., Hossain, M. S., Tusznio, J., & Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. (2021). Social benefits of river restoration from ecosystem services perspective: A systematic review. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.005

Brouwer, R., Kuik, O. J., Sheremet, O., Jiang, Y., Brands, D. K., Gerdes, H., Lago, M., Hinzmann, M., Angelopoulos, N., Cox, I., Nichersu, I., Reichert, P., Logar, I., Paillex, A., Schuwirth, N., Lehtoranta, V., Aroviita, J., Garcia de Jalon, D., & Gonzalez del Tanago, M. (2015). Cost-effective restoration measures that promote wider ecosystem and societal benefits (Deliverable D5.2). EU FP7 REFORM project. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/cost-effective-restoration-measures-that-promote-wider-ecosystem-/

Chen, W. T., Merrett, H. C., Liu, S.-S., Fauzia, N., & Liem, F. N. (2022). A Decade of Value Engineering in Construction Projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2324277. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2324277

Devuyst, D. (2000). Linking impact assessment and sustainable development at the local level: The introduction of sustainability assessment systems. Sustainable Development, 8(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(200005)8:2<67::AID-SD131>3.0.CO;2-X

Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., Alsulami, B., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2016). Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 71, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.033

Elhegazy, H. (2020). State-of-the-art review on benefits of applying value engineering for multi-story buildings. Intelligent Buildings International, 14(5), 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2020.1806019

Fenten, T., & Dieperink, C. (2024). Governance Conditions for a Successful Restoration of Riverine Ecosystems, Lessons from the Rhine River Basin. Water, 16(20), 2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202983

Halik, A., Firdaus, Simatupang, T. H., Nugroho, O. C., & Darmawan, O. (2026). Water resources management: among policy implementation and sustainable development in the special capital region of Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1580(1), 12068.

Hamed, N., Ismail, M. K., Mahmoud, S., El-Awady, M. A., & El-Feky, M. S. (2026). Waste-Derived, Nano-Engineered, High Early-Strength Concrete for Cost-Efficient Multi-Story Buildings. Buildings, 16(11), 2262.

Ikram, M., & Es‐sadki, J. (2026). Assessing Barriers to the Adoption of Green Technologies in Developing Countries by Using an Integrated Decision‐Making System. Sustainable Development, 34(3), 4309–4333.

Imron, A., & Husin, A. E. (2021). Value engineering and lifecycle cost analysis to improve cost performance in green hospital project. Archives of Civil Engineering, 67(4), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.138514

Infrastructure, I. for S. (2018). Envision Sustainable Infrastructure Framework Guidance Manual (Version 3). Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. https://sustainableinfrastructure.org/wp-content/uploads/EnvisionV3.9.7.2018.pdf

International, S. (2007). Value Standard and Body of Knowledge (2007 editi). SAVE International.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kumar, P., Masago, Y., Mishra, B. K., Jalilov, S., Emam, A. R., Kefi, M., & Fukushi, K. (2017). Current Assessment and Future Outlook for Water Resources Considering Climate Change and a Population Burst: A Case Study of Ciliwung River, Jakarta City, Indonesia. Water, 9(6), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060410

Li, Y., Wang, Q., Song, Y., Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). Assessing nature-based solutions: A developed SCGE model for long-term environmental and social impacts of urban green spaces on sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 112, 107776.

Lin, X., Mazlan, A. N., Ismail, S., Hu, L., Kasiman, E. H. Bin, & Yahya, K. (2023). Status of value management studies in construction projects: A systematic review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(1), 101820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101820

Marín, P., Cavaliere, F., Arroyo, A., Costa, G., Zürn, Z., Demozzi, T., & Favero, F. (2025). Contribution of restoration activities to NDCs (Nationally Determined Contributions). Deliverable D5, 4.

Pradilla, G., & Hack, J. (2024). An urban rivers renaissance? Stream restoration and green–blue infrastructure in Latin America – Insights from urban planning in Colombia. Urban Ecosystems, 27(6), 2245–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01571-9

Rahat, R., Ferrer, V., Pradhananga, P., & ElZomor, M. (2023). Developing an effective front-end planning framework for sustainable infrastructure projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(16), 2841–2858.

Riyanto, J., Wahyudi, S. I., & Wibowo, K. (2026). Value Engineering Strategies To Obtain Cost Efficiencies Or Net Benefits In Hospital Construction Projects. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN SIGNAL AND IMAGE SCIENCES, 808–821.

Rokeman, N. R. M. (2024). Likert measurement scale in education and social sciences: explored and explained. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 77–88.

Sharma, S., Kumar, S., & Singh, A. (2025). Assessment of Green Infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: S. Sharma et al. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(9), 20735–20744.

Skinner, S. W., Addai, A., Decker, S. E., & van Zyll de Jong, M. (2023). The ecological success of river restoration in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: Lessons learned. Ecology and Society, 28(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14379-280320

Sousa, M. C., Martins, R., Simões, N. E., & Feio, M. J. (2025). Ecosystem services of urban rivers: A systematic review. Aquatic Sciences, 87, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-024-01138-y

Statistik, B. P. (2024). Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/11/29/f24c83748852c605dd2c73cb/statistik-lingkungan-hidup-indonesia-2024

Stoffers, T., Altermatt, F., Baldan, D., Bilous, O., Borgwardt, F., Buijse, A. D., Bondar‐Kunze, E., Cid, N., Erős, T., & Ferreira, M. T. (2024). Reviving Europe’s rivers: Seven challenges in the implementation of the Nature Restoration Law to restore free‐flowing rivers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 11(3), e1717.

Sulvinajayanti, S., Bahfiati, T., & Iqbal Sultan, M. (2025). Book review: Product development and management body of knowledge: a guidebook for product innovation training and certification. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Szałkiewicz, E., Jusik, S., & Grygoruk, M. (2018). Status of and Perspectives on River Restoration in Europe: 310,000 Euros per Hectare of Restored River. Sustainability, 10(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010129

Taherdoost, H. (2017). Measurement and Scaling Techniques in Research Methodology; Survey / Questionnaire Development. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 6(1), 1–5. https://www.taherdoost.com/measurement-and-scaling-techniques-in-research-methodology-survey-questionnaire-development/

Ximenes, F. F. (2025). Analisis waktu dan biaya dalam pengendalian proyek konstruksi menggunakan metode earned value: Studi kasus proyek Gedung UNTL. Axial: Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Konstruksi, 13(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.30742/axial.v13i1.4333

Yu, C., & Pan, W. (2023). Inter-building effect on building energy consumption in high-density city contexts. Energy and Buildings, 278, 112632.

Yuan, Q., Yang, D., Yang, F., Luken, R., Saieed, A., & Wang, K. (2020). Green industry development in China: An index based assessment from perspectives of both current performance and historical effort. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119457

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28