BIM-Based Automation of Structural Quantity Take-off and Scheduling Using Autodesk Revit for Construction Risk Mitigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i4.409Keywords:
Building Information Modeling, Autodesk Revit, Quantity Take-Off, Cost Estimation, Schedule Planning, S-curve, 5D BIM, Construction Risk MitigationAbstract
Background: Inaccurate manual quantity take-off from two-dimensional drawings remains a documented driver of cost overruns and rework in Indonesian building projects, yet evidence on the accuracy of native BIM-based quantity extraction for heterogeneous, multi-story residential structures remains limited.
Objective: This single-case study evaluates Autodesk Revit 2023 for automated structural quantity take-off (QTO), cost estimation, and schedule planning at the Point Homy Haji Nawi building in Jakarta.
Method: A descriptive quantitative design was applied. A LOD 300 model comprising seven pile-cap types, ten column types, thirteen beam types, three slab specifications, and six levels was developed from the frozen DED revision. The model was validated through a dimensional audit against the DED and owner verification, and quantities were extracted using Revit’s Schedule/Quantities functionality. RAB tender unit prices were applied, and floor-level deviations were calculated using Deviation (%) = (Revit − RAB)/RAB × 100.
Results: Revit returned 557.83 m³ of K-350 concrete, 61,206.99 kg of reinforcement, and 7,575.00 m² of wire mesh, totaling IDR 2,966,557,705.83. The aggregate deviation from the RAB was IDR 9,426,887.17 (−0.32%), with a mean absolute floor-level deviation of 2.31%, which falls within the ±5% tolerance commonly accepted for tender estimates. The derived 24-week S-curve peaks at 10.02% in Week 16 and indicates a concentration of cash flow between Weeks 9 and 19.
Conclusion: For this project, Revit supported accurate and auditable QTO, cost estimation, and schedule planning; however, broader claims regarding construction risk mitigation require confirmation across multiple cases.
Downloads
References
Abdulaziz, H., & Ahmed, H. M. (2026). A customized business intelligence dashboard utilizing building information modeling for better control and management of construction projects. Buildings, 16(7), 1318.
Amin Ranjbar, A., Ansari, R., Taherkhani, R., & Hosseini, M. R. (2021). Developing a novel cash flow risk analysis framework for construction projects based on 5D BIM. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103341
Anjani, A., Bayzoni, B., Riakara Husni, H., & Niken, C. (2022). Penerapan Building Information Modeling (BIM) menggunakan Software Autodesk Revit pada Gedung 4 Rumah Sakit Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Universitas Lampung. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil Dan Desain (JRSDD), 10(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v10i1.2360
Asmaroni, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analisa Standart Kementerian PUPR Tahun 2016 dan SNI Tahun 2018 Pada Proyek Pembangunan Kantor Djarum DSO (District Sales Office) di Kota Pamekasan. Rekayasa: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 6(2), 25–29.
BIMForum. (2021). Level of Development (LOD) Specification Part I & Commentary: For Building Information Models and Data (2021 editi). BIMForum.
Cahyono, L., Apriani, M., Nugraha, A. T., & Utomo, A. P. (2022). Potensi Risiko Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek Swakelola di Kabupaten Pasuruan melalui Program Kotaku Kementerian PUPR. Jurnal Spektran, 10(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.24843/SPEKTRAN.2022.v10.i02.p08
Dalir, A. H., Pezeshki, Z., Ravanshadnia, M., Krinitsky, E., & Sultanguzin, I. A. (2025). Automatic monitoring in construction projects: Scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 5(1), 21–43.
Didar, E., Bazargan, A., & Bagherpour, M. (2026). Cash flow risk management across multiple construction projects using value at risk. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(8), 6750–6775.
Farhana, A., & Abma, V. (2022). Implementasi konsep BIM 5D pada pekerjaan struktur proyek gedung. Racic: Rab Construction Research, 7(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.36341/racic.v7i2.3004
Fitriani, H., Budiarto, A., Rachmadi, A., & Muhtarom, A. (2021). Analisis persepsi perusahaan AEC terhadap adopsi Building Information Modeling (BIM). Jurnal Media Teknik Sipil, 19(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmts.v19i1.14281
Hidayatulloh, S., & Anisa, A. (2022). Kajian Prinsip Arsitektur Berkelanjutan Pada Bangunan Perkantoran (Studi Kasus: Gedung Utama Kementrian PUPR). Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI, 5(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaz.v5i3.31467
Ija, L. I., Rabbani, N., Kumalasari, D., Firman, A., & Annasir, M. A. M. (2026). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Metode BIM Dan Metode Konvensional (Studi Kasus: Gedung Bank Mandiri Palembang). Rang Teknik Journal, 9(2), 92–100.
Jonathan, R., & Anondho, D. B. (2021). Perbandingan perhitungan volume pekerjaan dak beton bertulang antara metode BIM dengan konvensional. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 4(1), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v0i0.10473
Kasuma, R. S., & Beatrixs, M. (2022). Analisis perbandingan volume antara metode konvensional dengan aplikasi Revit 3D pada pekerjaan box culvert. Sondir, 6(2), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.36040/sondir.v6i2.5551
Khosakitchalert, C., Yabuki, N., & Fukuda, T. (2019). Improving the accuracy of BIM-based quantity takeoff for compound elements. Automation in Construction, 106, 102891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102891
Mahardika, D., & Windari, A. C. (2025). Penerapan Building Information Modelling (BIM) dalam Peningkatan Efisiensi dan Keberlanjutan pada Proyek High-Rise Building di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(1), 2455–2462.
Meléndez, W., Saavedra, R., Garcés, G., & Herrera, R. (2026). Comparative analysis of quantity take-off in reinforcing steel bars in apartment buildings based on CAD and BIM method: a case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(5), 751–771.
Nguyen, V. A., Ngo, V.-Y., Mai, V., & Nguyen, H. B. (2026). BIM-Based Quantity Takeoff for Stage-Based Payment in High-Rise Construction: A Semi-Automation Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 17(1), 93–110.
Nugroho, B. J., Baskoro, I. A., & Widiatmoko, K. W. (2022). Penerapan Aplikasi Building Information Modelling (BIM) pada Proyek Rehabilitasi Dermaga Multifungsi Pulang Pisau. Teknika, 17(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.26623/teknika.v17i2.5419
Numan, M. (2024). BIM and risk management: A review of strategies for identifying, analysing and mitigating project risks. Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, 3(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0301004
Olsen, D., & Taylor, J. M. (2017). Quantity Take-Off Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Its Limiting Factors. Procedia Engineering, 196, 1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.067
Pishdad, P., & Onungwa, I. O. (2024). Analysis of 5D BIM for cost estimation, cost control and payments. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 29, 525–548. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.024
PUPR, K. (2021). Evaluasi Implementasi Program Rumah Instan Sederhana Sehat (RISHA) di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Perumahan.
Ramadhandy, M. D., Handyani, N. K., & Dwiyanto, D. S. (2023). Analisis perbandingan BOQ menggunakan BIM Revit 2022 terhadap metode konvensional pada pekerjaan struktur rumah tinggal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil 2023, 466–471. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/14147
Ren, S., Qiang, G., Tang, S., Zhang, C., Seo, H.-J., & Wu, K. (2024). An automatic design-feedback process for structural prefabricated components quantity take-off calculation using BIM. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2272623
Saputra, Y. A., Purwaamijaya, I. M., & Masri, R. M. (2022). Implementasi model gambar kerja, analisis struktur, penjadwalan dan RAB dengan metode BIM. Jurnal Teknik Sipil KOKOH, 20(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.17509/k.v20i2.52366
Setiawan, A., Fassa, F., & Kusuma, N. H. (2022). Analisis komparasi perhitungan volume pekerjaan struktur berdasarkan metode SPMI dan BIM. Racic: Rab Construction Research, 7(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.36341/racic.v7i1.2400
Subagio, T., Wicaksono, D., Prihanto, T., & Santoso, E. B. (2022). Praksis implementasi pemodelan informasi bangunan (Building Information Modeling/BIM) dalam industri arsitektur, rekayasa dan konstruksi modern (Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry). Jurnal Talenta Sipil, 5(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.33087/talentasipil.v5i1.102
Suharianto, D. A., & Prasetyono, P. N. (2023). Perhitungan volume pekerjaan struktur proyek rumah cluster Bukit Golf menggunakan Autodesk Revit. Jurnal Vokasi Teknik Sipil (ViTeks), 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.26740/viteks.v1i2.55992
Susanti, R. (2020). Cost overrun and time delay of construction project in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1444(1), 12050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1444/1/012050
Syafii, M. H., & Azhari, H. (2025). Interaction between spiritual development and psychological growth: Implications for Islamic educational psychology in Islamic students. Journal of Islamic Education and Ethics, 3(1), 29–48.
Wang, L., Xu, S., Qiu, J., Wang, K., Ma, E., Li, C., & Guo, C. (2020). Automatic monitoring system in underground engineering construction: review and prospect. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020(1), 3697253.
Wati, D. S., & Warpindyastuti, L. D. (2024). Pengaruh motivasi dan pelatihan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan Kementerian PUPR. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 2(7). https://doi.org/10.62281/v2i7.700
Yimer, A. B. (2025). Analysis of Cost and Time Overruns for Major Public Building Construction Projects in Dire Dawa City, Ethiopia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maulidya Octaviani Bustamin, Anindias Goldawan Anugrah, Indra Komara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
