End-to-End 1D-CNN Leakage Detection in Low-Density Oil-Flow Pipelines Using Raw Simulated Vibration Signals

Authors

  • Bernadetta Kwintiana Universitas Media Nusantara Citra
  • Ravikumar Santhanam B.S.A.R. Crescent Institute of Science & Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i5.452

Keywords:

1D-CNN, Leakage Detection, Raw Vibration Signal, Binary Time-Series Classification

Abstract

Background: Leakage detection in low-density oil-flow pipelines remains challenging because leakage-induced vibrations can be masked by pump harmonics, flow-dependent vibrations, and background disturbances. This study investigates an end-to-end one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) that learns directly from raw vibration waveforms without handcrafted feature extraction.

Objective: This study aims to develop, validate, and benchmark a compact end-to-end 1D-CNN for binary leak/non-leak detection across five flow rates under defined noise conditions using a leakage-safe, flow-stratified evaluation protocol.

Methods: A physically informed numerical vibration dataset comprising 600 windows was generated for leak and non-leak conditions at flow rates of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 L/min. The data were divided into training, validation, and test sets using a 70:15:15 ratio. The proposed network contains three convolutional stages, global average pooling, a fully connected layer, dropout, and a sigmoid output, with 6,265 trainable parameters.

Results: On the independent test set, the model achieved 94.44% accuracy, 97.62% precision, 91.11% sensitivity, 97.78% specificity, an F1 score of 94.25%, an MCC of 0.891, and a ROC-AUC of 0.986. Performance remained approximately 94% at 20–30 dB SNR but decreased at 15 dB SNR.

Conclusion: The compact end-to-end 1D-CNN demonstrated strong leak/non-leak discrimination under the evaluated simulated conditions. Validation using real pipeline vibration measurements and broader operating conditions is required before practical deployment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Choi, J., & Im, S. (2023). Application of CNN models to detect and classify leakages in water pipelines using magnitude spectra of vibration sound. Applied Sciences, 13(5), Article 2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052845

Choi, J., Shin, J., Song, C., Han, S., & Park, D. I. (2017). Leak detection and location of water pipes using vibration sensors and modified ML prefilter. Sensors, 17(9), Article 2104. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092104

Czerwiński, A., & Łuczko, J. (2022). Experimental and numerical study on vibrations of a helical pipe with fluid flow. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 535, 117116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117116

El-Zahab, S., Abdelkader, E. M., & Zayed, T. (2018). An accelerometer-based leak detection system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 108, 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.030

Fabbiano, L., Vacca, G., & Dinardo, G. (2020). Smart water grid: A smart methodology to detect leaks in water distribution networks. Measurement, 151, 107260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107260

Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. Dalam Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (Vol. 70, hlm. 1321–1330). PMLR.

Ismail, M. I. M., Dziyauddin, R. A., Salleh, N. A. A., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Bani, N. A., Izhar, M. A. M., & Latiff, L. A. (2019). A review of vibration detection methods using accelerometer sensors for water pipeline leakage. IEEE Access, 7, 51965–51981. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896302

Ismail, M. I. M., Dziyauddin, R. A., Salleh, N. A. M., Ahmad, R., Azmi, M. H., & Kaidi, H. M. (2018). Analysis and procedures for water pipeline leakage using three-axis accelerometer sensors: ADXL335 and MMA7361. IEEE Access, 6, 71249–71261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878862

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.

Kiranyaz, S., Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Ince, T., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021). 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 151, 107398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398

Korlapati, N. V. S., Khan, F., Noor, Q., Mirza, S., & Vaddiraju, S. (2022). Review and analysis of pipeline leak detection methods. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2(4), Article 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100074

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Li, Q., Shi, Y., Lin, R., Qiao, W., & Ba, W. (2022). A novel oil pipeline leakage detection method based on the sparrow search algorithm and CNN. Measurement, 204, 112122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112122

Lu, H., Iseley, T., Behbahani, S., & Fu, L. (2020). Leakage detection techniques for oil and gas pipelines: State-of-the-art. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 98, 103249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103249

Medeiros, K. A. R., de Oliveira, F. L. A., Barbosa, C. R. H., & de Oliveira, E. C. (2016). Optimization of flow rate measurement using piezoelectric accelerometers: Application in water industry. Measurement, 91, 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.101

Okosun, F., Cahill, P., Hazra, B., & Pakrashi, V. (2019). Vibration-based leak detection and monitoring of water pipes using output-only piezoelectric sensors. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 228(7), 1659–1675. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-800150-6

Roberts, D. R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M. S., Elith, J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton, D. I., Wintle, B. A., Hartig, F., & Dormann, C. F. (2017). Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography, 40(8), 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881

Saleem, F., Ahmad, Z., Siddique, M. F., Umar, M., & Kim, J.-M. (2025). Acoustic emission-based pipeline leak detection and size identification using a customized one-dimensional DenseNet. Sensors, 25(4), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041112

Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1929–1958.

Wang, W., & Gao, Y. (2023). Pipeline leak detection method based on acoustic-pressure information fusion. Measurement, 212, Article 112691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112691

Xu, W., Huang, J., Sun, L., Yao, Y., Zhu, F., Xie, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024). An improved convolutional neural network for pipe leakage identification based on acoustic emission. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(10), 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101720

Yang, D., Hou, N., Lu, J., & Ji, D. (2022). Novel leakage detection by ensemble 1DCNN-VAPSO-SVM in oil and gas pipeline systems. Applied Soft Computing, 115, 108212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108212

Yang, D., Wang, P., Lu, J., Guan, C., & Dong, H. (2025). Leakage detection of oil and gas pipelines based on a multi-channel and multi-branch one-dimensional convolutional neural network with imbalanced samples. Computers in Industry, 173, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2025.104356

Yu, T., Chen, X., Yan, W., Xu, Z., & Ye, M. (2023). Leak detection in water distribution systems by classifying vibration signals. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 185, 109810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109810

Zhang, C., Liu, S., Zhao, W., Dong, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Qu, S., Yao, C., Lv, J., Li, S., Zhao, Q., Shang, Y., Liu, G., & Ni, J. (2024). Study on vibration signals identification method for pipeline leakage detection based on deep learning technology. Optics Communications, 565, 130588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2024.130588

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31